Shyam
The reality-inverting closed-logic of the 'Amway' Lord Haw Haw, Mr. Steadson, continues to poison your Blog.
Your free-thinking readers will have observed that (using my real name) I have posted a detailed analysis of why 'Amway' is a ongoing, major, organized crime group which can be compared to the 'Nazi' party, 'Scientology' and the 'Mafia.' I have also posted a detailed analysis of the delusional mind-set of masked 'Amway' apologists and explained why, in the light of the quantifiable evidence, all their fancy arguments are complex drivel designed to shut down the critical and evaluative faculties of current 'Amway' victims and casual observers.
Steadson cannot deny that the bosses of the 'Amway' mob are billionaires, or that the so-called 'Amway Business Opportunity' has had an (effectively) 100% loss-rate for tens of millions of temporary participants around the globe over a period exceeding 50 years. His predictable response is to invert quantifiable reality by squawking that it is persons challenging the authenticity of the comic-book 'Amway' myth (Total Financial Freedom in 2-5 years) who are sophists putting forward clever, but fallacious, arguments. Tellingly, Steadson offers not one shred of quantifiable evidence, or reasoned analysis, to support his latest arrogant affirmation.
Every time Steadson opens his fat beak and squawks from his endless 'Amway' script, he's merely pushing his billionaire bosses closer to a prison cell. I'm surprised they allow him to continue with his increasingly dismal performances. In view of his open-sympathy for 'Scientology,' it's not difficult to predict what the 'Amway' Lord Haw Haw will have to say about the Australian Senator, Nick Xenophon, who has recently condemned 'Scientology' as a global, organized crime group masquerading as a 'religion.' within the last few days, Senator Xenophon has tabled a motion in the Australian Parliament requesting a public enquiry into 'Scientology's' crimes. The Australian Prime Minister has promised that this request will be given serious consideration.
David Brear
The reality-inverting closed-logic of the 'Amway' Lord Haw Haw, Mr. Steadson, continues to poison your Blog.
Your free-thinking readers will have observed that (using my real name) I have posted a detailed analysis of why 'Amway' is a ongoing, major, organized crime group which can be compared to the 'Nazi' party, 'Scientology' and the 'Mafia.' I have also posted a detailed analysis of the delusional mind-set of masked 'Amway' apologists and explained why, in the light of the quantifiable evidence, all their fancy arguments are complex drivel designed to shut down the critical and evaluative faculties of current 'Amway' victims and casual observers.
Steadson cannot deny that the bosses of the 'Amway' mob are billionaires, or that the so-called 'Amway Business Opportunity' has had an (effectively) 100% loss-rate for tens of millions of temporary participants around the globe over a period exceeding 50 years. His predictable response is to invert quantifiable reality by squawking that it is persons challenging the authenticity of the comic-book 'Amway' myth (Total Financial Freedom in 2-5 years) who are sophists putting forward clever, but fallacious, arguments. Tellingly, Steadson offers not one shred of quantifiable evidence, or reasoned analysis, to support his latest arrogant affirmation.
Every time Steadson opens his fat beak and squawks from his endless 'Amway' script, he's merely pushing his billionaire bosses closer to a prison cell. I'm surprised they allow him to continue with his increasingly dismal performances. In view of his open-sympathy for 'Scientology,' it's not difficult to predict what the 'Amway' Lord Haw Haw will have to say about the Australian Senator, Nick Xenophon, who has recently condemned 'Scientology' as a global, organized crime group masquerading as a 'religion.' within the last few days, Senator Xenophon has tabled a motion in the Australian Parliament requesting a public enquiry into 'Scientology's' crimes. The Australian Prime Minister has promised that this request will be given serious consideration.
David Brear
2 comments:
Hey Brear, what is "(effectively)", brackets and all, actually supposed to mean?
Brear,
Your "detailed analysis" sucks. LOL
Post a Comment