Shyam
Yet again, it must be highly-revealing for you, and your free-thinking readers, to observe how there is absolutely no intelligible defence to the central charges against the billionaire 'Amway' bosses (and their millionaire under-bosses) coming from your three resident, intellectually-castrated 'Amway' apologists.
Not one member of this sad little trio of programmed 'Amway' stooges refutes the evidence that tens of millions of individuals around the world have been churned through a closed-market swindle, and related advanced fee frauds, during more than half a century. Not one refutes the evidence that the billionaire bosses of the 'Amway' mob have used a proportion of their ill-gotten gains to infiltrate traditional culture, and created a labyrinth of (apparently independent) corporate structures, in order to obstruct investigation of their crimes and isolate themselves from liability. Not one stooge refutes the evidence that unquestioning belief in the 'Amway' myth has left a trail of destitution, depression, dissociation, divorce and even death.
On the contrary, the 'Amway' Lord Haw Haw, Mr. 'IBOFB' Steadson, has produced one of his most pathetic (and painfully obvious) posts. In which the masked-character assassin displays his habitual total lack of concern for the victims of the 'Amway' myth and reverts to his classic 'Scientology'-style thought-stopping tactic known as 'Bull-Baiting' . In many respects, Steadson reminds me of a sniggering, adolescent schoolboy trying to attract attention to himself by mimicking adults (and being familiar) in order to provoke them.
Again, Shyam, notice how Steadson and Johnson arrogantly assume that I am addressing my comments directly to them, when (quite obviously) I am only addressing you and your free-thinking readers.
David Brear
Yet again, it must be highly-revealing for you, and your free-thinking readers, to observe how there is absolutely no intelligible defence to the central charges against the billionaire 'Amway' bosses (and their millionaire under-bosses) coming from your three resident, intellectually-castrated 'Amway' apologists.
Not one member of this sad little trio of programmed 'Amway' stooges refutes the evidence that tens of millions of individuals around the world have been churned through a closed-market swindle, and related advanced fee frauds, during more than half a century. Not one refutes the evidence that the billionaire bosses of the 'Amway' mob have used a proportion of their ill-gotten gains to infiltrate traditional culture, and created a labyrinth of (apparently independent) corporate structures, in order to obstruct investigation of their crimes and isolate themselves from liability. Not one stooge refutes the evidence that unquestioning belief in the 'Amway' myth has left a trail of destitution, depression, dissociation, divorce and even death.
On the contrary, the 'Amway' Lord Haw Haw, Mr. 'IBOFB' Steadson, has produced one of his most pathetic (and painfully obvious) posts. In which the masked-character assassin displays his habitual total lack of concern for the victims of the 'Amway' myth and reverts to his classic 'Scientology'-style thought-stopping tactic known as 'Bull-Baiting' . In many respects, Steadson reminds me of a sniggering, adolescent schoolboy trying to attract attention to himself by mimicking adults (and being familiar) in order to provoke them.
Again, Shyam, notice how Steadson and Johnson arrogantly assume that I am addressing my comments directly to them, when (quite obviously) I am only addressing you and your free-thinking readers.
David Brear
12 comments:
Too scared to address me directly, aren't you? LOL
Tex is a timid fellow that he could not talk coherently while talking to me. Moreover, he invites every one to address him directly. No one is scared to talk to him but it is only disgust.
YOU were the timid one on the phone. You couldn't answer simple, straightforward questions. LOL
YOU were the incoherent one, repeating your "money circulation scheme" mantra no matter what the question was. LOL
Isn't that the purpose of a forum, to address each other? LOL
Brear is scared, just ask him....LOL
Tex, whatever the question is the scheme is nothing but illegal money circulation scheme and Amway adherents are crooks out to cheat others. No one can get away with a crime on the pretext the prices are reduced. The timidity is heard in his voice as it is barely audible.
Shyam,
In my theoretical example, the product prices were half of what you find in the stores. Absent a tool scam, this makes it IMPOSSIBLE for this scenario to be a money circulation scheme, as people are SAVING money on the products. You're so stupid you even give Brear a run for top spot! LOL
You must have had a bad connection, as I was almost shouting into the phone trying to get you to answer simple questions. Try holding the earpiece next to your ear next time, it works better than constantly repeating "money circulation scheme" into the microphone! LOL
Clueless Tex thinks if the prices are reduced there would not be a scam. But what he conveniently forgets is the scheme itself is a scam. If Amway products could be sold in an open market then there would be no scam. IT is the mathematical impossibility that makes it illegal. Where do you find so many people to continue the enrollment infinitely. Dumbheaded Tex thinks it is alright. If anyone completes one cycle of 102 members under him, he could earn Rs. 56,500 every month. Everyone wants to earn that amount and where do they find so many people on earth. That is why Amway scheme is a scam and Tex is clueless.
Shyam,
You are not considering the real and practical limitations of:
1. Many people are lazy, and want "something for nothing", so it won't grow as you suggest,
2. Their circumstances change, so it won't grow as you suggest (this goes both ways, people join who drop out, and people initially reject the business and later join),
3. They die (the ultimate change in circumstances!), so it won't grow as you suggest,
4. New people are turning 18 (or whatever the minimum age is in your country), so there are plenty of new people available every single day, so the population isn't as limited as you suggest.
Take you, for example. #1, 2, and 3 apply to you, and if you have a family, so does #4.
Tex is clueless. Even in a best case scenario where nobody quits and everyone does 100 PV, you still need at least 74 downline IBOs all doing their PV to have one direct. The more directs you have, the more lower level IBOs are needed to support the directs (platinums). How tex fails to see this simple fact is beyond me.
jc,
So you're saying it is impossible to put together a Platinum business? LOL
Impossible for textards.
Who said it was impossible? I said the more platinums you have, the more downline you will need to support them. It this hard to understand?
I never said anything that would indicate I don't understand this. LOL
In fact, this issue is also why the average gross income is as low as it is, a simple fact YOU don't comprehend. LOL
Post a Comment