NMart's scheme is illegal

A reader writes: Dear sir, We have visited to NMART at surat branch and they confirmed about his scheme that they will provide us & his becoming member, They had also show us legal documents and committed to give such scheme whichever he said, its all mentioned in stamp paper & giving with conformation latter about scheme.... They said its all legal things its not fraud but still we are in confusion that something wrong in it,.... In this situation we have read all the information about company on CFW according that its all about fraud.......we want some clarification about this company is it true company or fraud..... Corporate Frauds Watch says: Crooks always come out with some documents to claim what they are doing legal. The binary scheme of NMart is nothing but money circulation scheme banned under the provisions of Prize Chits & Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act, 1978. The Supreme Court of India recently stated that it is 'mathematical impossibility' and the organisers of the scheme should be booked under Section 420 of IPC (cheating). There is no law which supports the scheme of the NMart and what they are doing is illegal and a criminal case should be filed against them immediately.

The 'Amway' mob knows when to hold 'em, knows when to fold 'em

Shyam

I don't know if 'Rocket' and 'Joecool' are poker players or fans of the American country singer, Kenny Rogers, but I'm sure they worked out a long time ago that the 'Amway' Lord Haw Haw (exactly like 'Amway's' aggressive echelon of attorneys in the recent Pokorny RICO lawsuit) is bluffing.

Although he's obviously a stone-faced professional who never blinks (and who apparently never sleeps) the arrogant Mr. Steadson has got absolutely nothing in his hand. Indeed, the Unbeatable Royal Flush which Mr. Steadson steadfastly pretends to hold (24 hrs per day), has been completely fabricated in 'Amway Diamonds' at the direction of the billionaire bosses of the 'Amway' mob. Furthermore, the 'Amway' Lord Haw Haw knows that this crooked deck of 'Amway' cards will not stand up to rigorous, independent scrutiny.

Interestingly, when 'Amway's' attorneys' own Unbeatable Royal Flush in Diamonds was about to be called in the recent Pokorny RICO lawsuit (because the plaintiffs' unflinching attorneys had laid out several millions dollars of their own funds to force the billionaire bosses of the 'Amway' mob into laying their crooked cards on the table to be scrutinized by a real judge) they folded, and allowed their opponents (whom they knew to be holding the real winning hand) to take an easily-affordable $155 millions pot, rather than going all-in and losing everything.

One can almost imagine the grinning patriarchs of the DeVos and VanAndel clans (back in 1978) taking their inspiration from the Kenny Rogers hit, 'The Gambler':

'You got to know when to hold 'em, know when to fold 'em,

Know when to walk away, know when to run

You never count your money, when you're sittin' at the table

There'll be time enough for countin, when the dealin's done.'

In reality, at any time during the previous 50+ years (if they had only realized that they were being bluffed) agents of the US government could have sat down at the table with the billionaire bosses of the 'Amway' mob and forced them to go all-in. That would have taken the grins off their faces.

David Brear (copyright 2010)

'Amway's' attorneys capitulated , but Mr. Steadson still claims victory

Shyam

I'm sure that 'Rocket' and 'Joecool' know exactly what is going on. The unmasked 'Amway' Lord Haw Haw, Mr. 'IBOFB' Steadson, is typically trying to focus your free-thinking readers on the one pathetic little fragment of the Pokorny RICO lawsuit against 'Amway' which (taken in splendid isolation) can be mispresented by the 'Amway' Ministry of Truth as an important victory.

Self-evidently the mind-numbing bullshit which has recently been dumped on your Blog and signed by 'IBOFB,' has come directly from 'Amway's' aggressive echelon of reality-inverting attorneys. Yes, the same attorneys who actually capitulated to the tune of $155 millions in the wider Pokorny RICO lawsuit against 'Amway,' but whom Mr. Steadson steadfastly pretends could have easily been victorious had the case gone to trial, because their clients were innocent businessmen, not guilty racketeers.

The linguistically-precise claims which have just been made on your Blog on behalf of the billionaire bosses of the 'Amway' mob about Robert FitzPatrick and Stephen Hayford's irrefutable expert-witness declarations to the California court hearing the Pokorny RICO lawsuit against 'Amway', centre on the court's decision to sustain 'Amway's' attorneys' objection and strike (what 'Amway's' attorneys described as) two purported expert witness declarations from the initial stages of the hearing, because accepting these declarations at such an early stage without hearing supporting-arguments or hearing 'Amway's' attorneys' counter-arguments would have been contrary to the principles of US justice. In other words, 'Amway's' attorneys found a legal loophole where, technically, for the Judge to have allowed the plaintiffs' expert-witnesses declarations to stand, he would have had to have heard the entire case. However, at this stage of the hearing, what was still at issue was whether the entire case (including the declarations of the plaintiffs' expert witnesses) would be allowed to proceed to full trial. Contrary to what Mr. Steadson and his invisible de facto criminal associates have implied, at no stage in these initial proceedings was Robert FitzPatrick judged by the court to be unqualified as an expert witness.

In an obvious attempt to obstruct justice, 'Amway's' attorneys had delayed proceedings in the Pokorny RICO lawsuit by pointing to a clause in the plaintiffs' 'Amway/Quixtar Distributor' take-it-or-leave-it contracts, which was maliciously designed to fool them into believing that their rights as US citizens to get a fair hearing in an authentic American court had been taken away. Thus, forcing the plaintiffs into a parallel, Mafia-style system of internal dispute-resolution. For decades, this abusive, closed-logic, judicial charade has required destitute victims of the 'Amway' racket (who suspected that they had been cheated), first to hand over more than $10 thousands to the racketeers who had cheated them, before they could get an unfair hearing.

Not surprisingly, the Judge, rejected and roundly-condemned 'Amway's' abusive, counterfeit system of justice, and ordered the Pokorny RICO lawsuit to go to full trial in an authentic American court.

It was this reality, which 'Amway's' attorneys chose not to face, by capitulating.

Mr. Steadson's latest unsubstantiated claims about 'Amway UK Ltd.' having turned over a new leaf, completely disregard the fact that, during more than 30 years, at least one million UK and Irish citizens were churned through 'Amway's' premeditated closed-market swindle and related advance fee frauds.

David Brear (copyright 2010)

Mr. Steadson now admits that he wasn't telling the truth, but he continues to lie

Shyam

The unmasked and unqualified 'Amway' Lord Haw Haw, Mr.'IBOFB' Steadson, has posted a false and defamatory statement on your Blog which implies that Robert FitzPatick's declaration to the California court which heard the Pokorny RICO lawsuit against 'Amway/Quixtar,' was initially rejected by the court on the grounds that he is not qualified as as an expert witness. In reality, it was 'Amway's' attorneys, not the court, who described Robert FitzPatrick as being unqualified. These attorneys were following typical bully-boy tactics which sought to prevent the case from going to trial by invoking 'Amway's' own (apparently obligatory) Mafia-style internal system of dispute resolution. Amazingly, this system required destitute 'Amway' victims first to hand over thousands of dollars to the same racketeers who had cheated them, before they could even get an unfair hearing. However, the Judge evidently deduced that this parallel system of (in)justice was itself part of the 'Amway' racket, and decided to allow the Pokorny RICO suit against 'Amway' (which would have included Robert FitzPatrick's declaration) to go to trial. In the adult world of quantifiable reality, one of the main reasons why the same 'Amway' attorneys then were forced to agree to an out-of-court settlement of the Pokorny RICO suit that will cost their employers $155 millions, was that they were unable to refute Robert FitzPatrick's expert analysis of the so-called 'Amway/Quixtar MLM Business Model,' which reveals that (over a period of more than 50 years) tens of millions of transient and ill-informed 'Amway/Quixtar' victims have been condemned to lose their time and money to the benefit of a handful of greedy racketeers.

Despite his previous lies, Mr. Steadson has now been forced to concede on your Blog that Robert FitzPatick's declaration to the California court which was to hear the rest of the Pokorny RICO lawsuit against 'Amway/Quixtar,' is substantially accurate. Conveniently, he now claims to be unaware that 'Amway's' aggressive echelon of attorneys were unable to have the declaration rejected as the latter stages of these unstoppable judicial proceedings loomed.

Thus Robert FitzPatrick would have been allowed to declare to the court::

'Based on my analysis of Quixtar and the related Kingpin "Tools" business of selling and distributing books, tapes and seminars to Quixtar recruits (IBOs), I characterize the business models of both organizations as pyramid schemes that are inherently deceptive, unfair and harmful.

To reach this conclusion, among other things, I examined the published data from Quixtar regarding its commission payouts in recent years. Applying this data to a statistical sample of distributors reveals that 99.4% of all the IBOs earned on average just $13.41 per week before product purchases, all business expenses and taxes. The average income is far less than the costs of the business, resulting in 99% of victims of Quixtar making no profit. Fewer than 1 person in 10 000 are at the "Diamond and above" levels, the upper ranks of the Quixtar chain that every new recruit is urged to aspire to.

The massive loss rates among Quixtar victims that are revealed in Quixtar's own data, are the inevitable mathematical result of the endless chain business model. In this model the success of the IBO is based on continuous recruiting of additional distributors (IBOs) who are induced to make monthly purchases for their own consumption, rather than making retail sales in the open marketplace. In the recruitment model only those participants at the top levels of the pyramid can earn true profits, since the source of a participant's real income is the expenditures of those below them on the pyramid, and only a small percentage can be on those top positions. The untenable model results in approximately 70% of IBOs quitting Quixtar within the first year. The mission of this deceptive business model is to continuously enroll losing investors (IBOs) and replace them as they suffer losses and quit the program.

Millions of ordinary Americans as well as people from many other countries have been targets of Quixtar's pyramid recruitment campaign. They are lured by claims and promises of a unique and extraordinary new income opportunity. The complex pay plan that concentrates commission payments at the top levels of the recruitment chain is seldom understood or even known by many new recruits. They are uninformed about the loss rates and drop out rates amongst distributors (IBOs). Virtually none has knowledge about the profits and ownership patterns related to the "Tools" businesses.'

Your free-thinking readers will notice that this unchallenged explanation of the 'Amway' swindle, is in full agreement with our own.

David Brear (copyright 2010)

Mr. Steadson's unqualified interpretation of the law of perjury is a lie

Shyam

It's difficult to believe that the 'Amway' Lord Haw Haw, Mr.'IBOFB,' Steadson, is not blind drunk when he composes the unsolicited, reality-inverting bullshit which he regularly dumps your Blog. So far, his only explanation of why Robert FitzPatrick has not been charged with pejury for making what Mr. Steadson claims to have been a false declaration to the California court hearing the Pokorny RICO lawsuit against 'Amway' ( http://www.casewatch.org/civil/amway/fitzpatrick.pdf ) has been: that Robert FitzPatrick was not lying to the court and, therefore, not committing perjury, because he believed his false statement to be true.

As you know, perjury is the willful act of swearing a false oathor affirmation to tell the truth (whether spoken or in writing) concerning matters material to a judicial proceeding (i.e. a witness falsely promises to tell the truth about matters which effect the outcome of the case). Perjury is considered a serious offence as it can be used to usurp the power of the courts, resulting in miscarriages of justice. In the USA, the general perjury statute under Federal law defines perjury as a felony and provides for a prison sentence of up to five years. In the UK, a potential penalty for perjury is a prison sentence of up to 7 years. The rules for perjury also apply when a person has made a statement under penalty of perjury, even if the person has not been sworn or affirmed as a witness before an appropriate official. Statements of interpretation of simple fact are not perjury because people often make inaccurate statements unwittingly and not deliberately. Individuals may have honest, but mistaken, beliefs about certain simple facts, or their recollection may be inaccurate. Like most other crimes in the common law system, to be convicted of perjury one must have had the intention to commit the act, and to have actually committed the act, of lying in order to effect the outcome of a judicial proceeding. Subornation of perjury, or attempting to induce another person to perjure themselves, is itself a crime.

Mr. Steadson's simplistic interpretation of the law of perjury in respect of Robert FitzPatrick's declaration in the Pokorny RICO lawsuit is, therefore, a demonstrable lie; for Robert FitzPatrick is not just a simple witness whom Mr. Steadson has accused of unwittingly making an innaccurate statement of simple fact to a court. In reality, this expert witness gave a long and detailed explanation to a court of what qualifies him as a expert witness and of why 'Amway's' so-called 'Multilevel Marketing Business Opportunity' (which, during the previous 50+ years, has had no significant or sustainable source of revenue other than its own victims) is, in his expert opinion, fundamentally fraudulent. Given the intentional, extensive and detailed nature of his declaration, and the fact that he has delivered essentially the same declaration in more than a dozen State and federal prosecutions concerning so-called 'Multilevel Marketing' companies, it would be impossible for Robert Fitzpatrick to be simply mistaken.

Self-evidently, Mr. Steadson has, on behalf of the billionaire bosses of the 'Amway' mob, been trying to weasel his way out of possibly being sued for libel for making a false (albeit indirect) accusation of perjury against Robert FitzPatrick.

David Brear (copyright 2010)

UK government agents have authorized fraud and corruption

Shyam

The 'Amway' Ministry of Truth continues to defraud the public all around the world by steadfastly pretending that the 'Amway' organization, and the (so-called) 'Multilevel Marketing Business Opportunity' which it has offered to the public for more than 50 years, enjoy full government approval all around the world.

In reality, government agencies all around the world have followed the corrupt lead of the de facto American kleptocracy, and simply refused to launch a rigorous criminal enquiry into the entire 'Multilevel Marketing' racket, let alone enforce basic criminal laws which were designed to protect the public by prohibiting all acts of fraud and corruption. In other words, by doing effectively nothing to challenge the authenticity of the pernicious 'MLM' fiction, government law enforcement agents have authorized fraud and corruption. Indeed, it was the Cardinal Richelieu who (in the 17th century) made the axiomatic observation that:

'by passing a law and then failing to enforce it, you authorize the very crime which you would seek to prohibit.'

Today (more than 30 years after the pernicious 'MLM' lie first arrived in the UK and millions UK citizens have bought into itfalsely believing it to enjoy full government approval), two UK government law enforcement agencies are still arguing about whose responsibility it is to investigate and prosecute 'Business Opportunity' fraud. Indeed, some of the face-saving statements recently made to me by low-level agents of the UK Serious Fraud Office and high-level agents of the Companies Investigation Branch of the UK Ministry for Business, could have come straight out of George Orwell's'Nineteen Eighty-Four.'

Personally, I have found it impossible to make direct contact with any legally-qualified agent of the UK SFO. These individuals hide behind an echelon of unqualified Orwellian officials whose job it is to field complaints and enquiries from whistle-blowers and concerned members of the public, and then systematically inform them that, 'in this instance, the SFO cannot take action.' As has previously been explained on this Blog, the UK SFO is a demonstrably-impotent organization which has cost UK tax payers more than £40 millions annually and which has comprised more than 300 qualified and unqualified agents allegedly charged with the investigation and prosecution of complex, nationally, and internationally, based frauds and acts of corruption involving amounts in excess of £1 million. Somewhat surprisingly, the Director of the UK SFO has spent large quantities of UK tax-payers money broadcasting the embarrassing facts that fraud and corruption cost the UK economy at least $30000000000 annually (that's £30 billions or £30 thousands millions), but that, last year, the SFO prosecuted less than 20 cases and only managed to recover around £4 millions for victims. Consequently, it doesn't take a genius to work out that, by boasting that the annual SFO recovery-rate (by value) for the victims of fraud and corruption in the UK has been at least 7.5 thousand times less than their total annual loss-rate (by value), the head of the UK SFO might as well have sent out gilt-edged invitations for foreign-based racketeers to come to the UK, where their chances of being held to account by his impotent agency have been effectively zero.

David Brear (copyright 2010)

'Amway' apologist posts more unsubstantiated claims

Shyam

I see that that your deluded young friend, Trivedi, has reappeared on your Blog. Evidently, the poor little lad still needs to believe that the kitsch comic-book dream-world of 'Amway' is real. He now seriously expects your free-thinking readers to accept (without question) his own unsubstantiated claims to be regularly retailing 'Amway's' (effectively unsaleable) wampum to the Indian public for a profit, and to be acquainted with at least one other individual (his own cousin) who is doing the same.

Perhaps we should remind Trivedi that, in the adult world of quantifiable reality, if he were to repeat the same reality-inverting fairy-tales in court of law as he has just posted on your Blog, then he would risk being charged with perjury. The recent claim made on your Blog by the unmasked, and unqualified, 'Amway' Lord Haw Haw , Mr. 'IBOFB' Steadson, that lying under oath is not perjury provided the liar believes that he/she is telling the truth, is itself a lie.

The unchallenged deposition of Robert FitzPatrick (which was made under penalty of perjury) to a Court in California http://www.casewatch.org/civil/amway/fitzpatrick.pdf , combined with the substantiated witness testimony of the plaintiffs in the same case, clearly demonstrates that 'Amway's' dwindling flock of Internet apologists cannot be telling the truth. Anyone with fully-functioning critical faculties can see that Robert FitzPatrick, far from being a deluded and isolated liar (as he has been falsely portrayed on your Blog by the 'Amway' Lord Haw Haw), is actually an internationally-respected author and business analyst who has served as a consultant and expert witness in more than a dozen State and federal court cases involving so-called 'Multilevel Marketing' companies.

Strangely, during 3 years of the Pokorny RICO lawsuit, attorneys acting for the billionaire bosses of the 'Amway'mob were unable to produce the audited accounts of the American equivalents of Trivedi, which might have proved that, contrary to Robert FitzPatrick's deposition and the substantiated witness testimony of the plaintiffs in the case, significant numbers of 'Amway' adherents (and their cousins) have always made regular profitable retail sales of 'Amway's (effectively unsaleable) wampum to the American public.

Self-evidently, the reason why the billionaire bosses of the'Amway' mob were recently obliged to agree to a settlement which will cost them $155 millions, was to avoid the unstoppable Pokorny RICO lawsuit from going to trial.

Only deluded 'Amway' worshipers could possibly believe otherwise.

David Brear (copyright 2010)