Wednesday, 1 December 2010

'Amway's' attorneys capitulated , but Mr. Steadson still claims victory

I'm sure that 'Rocket' and 'Joecool' know exactly what is going on. The unmasked 'Amway' Lord Haw Haw, Mr. 'IBOFB' Steadson, is typically trying to focus your free-thinking readers on the one pathetic little fragment of the Pokorny RICO lawsuit against 'Amway' which (taken in splendid isolation) can be mispresented by the 'Amway' Ministry of Truth as an important victory.
Self-evidently the mind-numbing bullshit which has recently been dumped on your Blog and signed by 'IBOFB,' has come directly from 'Amway's' aggressive echelon of reality-inverting attorneys. Yes, the same attorneys who actually capitulated to the tune of $155 millions in the wider Pokorny RICO lawsuit against 'Amway,' but whom Mr. Steadson steadfastly pretends could have easily been victorious had the case gone to trial, because their clients were innocent businessmen, not guilty racketeers.
The linguistically-precise claims which have just been made on your Blog on behalf of the billionaire bosses of the 'Amway' mob about Robert FitzPatrick and Stephen Hayford's irrefutable expert-witness declarations to the California court hearing the Pokorny RICO lawsuit against 'Amway', centre on the court's decision to sustain 'Amway's' attorneys' objection and strike (what 'Amway's' attorneys described as) two purported expert witness declarations from the initial stages of the hearing, because accepting these declarations at such an early stage without hearing supporting-arguments or hearing 'Amway's' attorneys' counter-arguments would have been contrary to the principles of US justice. In other words, 'Amway's' attorneys found a legal loophole where, technically, for the Judge to have allowed the plaintiffs' expert-witnesses declarations to stand, he would have had to have heard the entire case. However, at this stage of the hearing, what was still at issue was whether the entire case (including the declarations of the plaintiffs' expert witnesses) would be allowed to proceed to full trial. Contrary to what Mr. Steadson and his invisible de facto criminal associates have implied, at no stage in these initial proceedings was Robert FitzPatrick judged by the court to be unqualified as an expert witness.
In an obvious attempt to obstruct justice, 'Amway's' attorneys had delayed proceedings in the Pokorny RICO lawsuit by pointing to a clause in the plaintiffs' 'Amway/Quixtar Distributor' take-it-or-leave-it contracts, which was maliciously designed to fool them into believing that their rights as US citizens to get a fair hearing in an authentic American court had been taken away. Thus, forcing the plaintiffs into a parallel, Mafia-style system of internal dispute-resolution. For decades, this abusive, closed-logic, judicial charade has required destitute victims of the 'Amway' racket (who suspected that they had been cheated), first to hand over more than $10 thousands to the racketeers who had cheated them, before they could get an unfair hearing.
Not surprisingly, the Judge, rejected and roundly-condemned 'Amway's' abusive, counterfeit system of justice, and ordered the Pokorny RICO lawsuit to go to full trial in an authentic American court.
It was this reality, which 'Amway's' attorneys chose not to face, by capitulating.
Mr. Steadson's latest unsubstantiated claims about 'Amway UK Ltd.' having turned over a new leaf, completely disregard the fact that, during more than 30 years, at least one million UK and Irish citizens were churned through 'Amway's' premeditated closed-market swindle and related advance fee frauds.
David Brear (copyright 2010)


IBOFB said...

My claims about Amway UK are unsubstantiated?

Are you claiming Amway UK is forging the Earnings Disclosure document?

Joecool said...

That's what IBOFb does. He focuses on semantics or side issues and diverts the attention away from the issue. I used to think he was just stupid but I think purposely dishonest is a better description of his behavior.

rocket said...

Oh make no mistake about it.

It's deceptive.

It's deliberate.

But that's what good ol' Steadson is all about.

Why? That's the only X factor. He has no demonstrable success, nor does Amway seem to appreciate his efforts.

I have theories, but I'm not prepared at this time to present evidence to support it. I have more important things to deal with in my life other than some failed Amway hack troll.

Maybe in a while I will do so.

Joecool said...

Let me cite a specific example of how IBOFB/Steadson operates.

We were having a debate on how many diamonds, WWDB diamond in particular brag about how they pay for everything in cash, even their homes. I mentioned that I heard that while sitting in a function at the Rose Garden in Portland. I had mentioned that the Rose Garden seated about 20 to 25,000 people and IBOFB diverted the discussion because wikipedia listed the seating capacity of the Rose garden at 18,000. I simply pointed out that the entire floor area where the basketball court is, was completely lines with seats, thus the Rose Garden indeed could hold nearly 25,000 IBOs.

IBOFB then counters that someone once heard a diamond mention renting a home. And that was his defense to the claim that WWDB diamonds brag about paying for everything in cash. Never mind that they hold an annual function called Dream Night where they still brag about their material wealth and some IBOs in WWDB still talk about how one day they will buy a home in cash.