Tuesday, 17 November 2009

Beware of the evil designs of Amway crooks

These Amway apologists are really funny fellows. On one hand, they say that there is no necessity to follow 6-4-3- plan. On the other, they do not say what one has to do to achieve total financial freedom in 2-5 years. If nobody needs to do anything how would they achieve total financial freedom in 2-5 years. If their aim is not total financial freedom why should they become members by paying some amount (they say now it is only Rs. 995).
They should accept that if there is no enrolment there is no Amway business. Enrolment is the major iassue pointed out by the Andhra Pradesh High Court which said that there would be hot pursuit by members to enrol more members into the Business Model of Amway.
If Amway products are really superior in quality, they could sell these products in an open market instead of cheating people with membership fee, renewal fee, so on and so forth. That is why I am calling upon people not to fall prey to the crooked designs of these fraudsters and lose thier hard-earned money.
My dear fellow human beings all over world! Throw these fraudulent companies out of your respective countries. Enlighten your neighbours about the evils designs of these companies.

6 comments:

dtytrivedi said...

i also tell u that there many people who make overstatements and I agree with that, but our team and even our uplines during the showing the plan have told the stuff that 2-5 yrs people go financially free.

we say its a business so we can't make any commitments regarding the income.

well i tell one thing if it was only recruitments then amway wouldn't have been making huge turnover of $8.2 billion (bigger than yahoo) globally.

As far as financial freedom is concerned just show me the website where it claims what u are saying.

Amway don't make such claims its the distributors make the faulty claims.

as far as ur another point is concerned
"If their aim is not total financial freedom why should they become members by paying some amount (they say now it is only Rs. 995)"

listen its a distributorship, tell me if i want to buy a distributorship of any conventional business how much do i have to invest in that?

U are getting distributorship of more than 110 products in Rs 995.

don't u get it.

dtytrivedi said...

and regarding ur statement

"If Amway products are really superior in quality, they could sell these products in an open market instead of cheating people with membership fee, renewal fee, so on and so forth"

i think mcdonald is also closed market, apart from its outlets where u can get burgars of mc donalds

dtytrivedi said...

hey and one thing that will make u nullify ur false belief that its 2-5 year financial freedom.

(this will prove that its distributors who make faulty claims not amway corporations)

http://www.amwaywiki.com/images/8/86/Amagram_IN_200909-10.pdf

go this link, this is one of the amway magazine i found, now i tell u this if u consider diamond pin as financial freedom then

have look some people who have reached over there. Refer to date of joining (DOJ)

u will see that no one took 5 yrs infact more than 5 yrs.

even the pins lower than diamond like platinums, ruby and other people took more than 5yrs or less than 3 yrs. u will find all type of people over there.

The point i am making is that there is no any sort of time limit given in amway.

Its distributors make the faulty claims. show me the claim what u say in any of the amway websites where it makes such claims

Legal Scan said...

Trivedi, Hilarious! I am not aware that I need to become a member paying some amount to buy a burger from McDonald. Think , just think before writing anything absurd, Youngman Trivedi.

dtytrivedi said...

well thats hilarious tooo u didnt understand ma point.

who said that a person needs to be a member or distributor of amway.

u just have to find the distribuor likewise u find the mcdonald outlet.

have heard a guy saying that i want to purchase amway product i don't find any distrubor in ma place!!!!

dtytrivedi said...
This comment has been removed by the author.