Shyam
As ever, your resident little troop of (two) dancing 'Amway' monkeys have been trying to ignore the real issues, and/or trying to drag your Blog into the gutter.
The unmasked 'Amway' Lord Haw Haw, Mr. 'IBOFB' Steadson, continues to play the reality-inverting role of the perfectly-innocent, independent and honest little 'Amway' defence witness being unjustly attacked by aggressive liars.
However, on the one hand, whilst he never really explains what our motives might be for lying (other than to make absurd, and libellous, accusations that we are 'communists', 'sociopaths', 'cultists', etc.), on the other hand, Mr. Steadson's own motives for trying to character-assassinate all 'Amway' dissidents (internal and external) and for trying to hide the truth about the noxious effects, and addictive nature, of so-called 'Multilevel Marketing,' are self-evident.
Mr. Steadson is a co-opted (minor) academic representing (major) racketeers who (for more than half a century) have amassed billions of stolen dollars by steadfastly pretending to offer a lawful 'Business Opportunity' based on the sale of good-value high-quality products, and not on the recruitment of a never-ending chain of ill-informed individuals into a premeditated closed-market swindle, or illegal money circulation scheme (camouflaged by effectively-unsaleable wampum) and related advance fee fraud (i.e. 'tool scam').
Since 1959, the made-up terms, 'Amway' and 'MLM' have hidden a series of inter-related, blame-the-victim frauds which have been operated behind a labyrinth of (apparently independent) corporate structures maliciously created to prevent, and/or divert, investigation and isolate their beneficiaries from liability.
So far, not one shred of independent evidence has been produced (in the form of audited accounts) to prove that Mr. Steadson's billionaire de facto bosses have not been hiding the truth about their claimed 'multi-billion dollar annual sales.' Indeed, he can't even prove that he himself has ever genuinely sold any 'Amway' wampum for a profit to any person who actually existed and who was not a member of his immediate family, and/or under contract to 'Amway'. Exactly like the proven closed-market swindler, Bernie Madoff, the 'Amway' bosses' first-line of defence comprises absurd multi-billion dollar lists of apparently lawful and profitable transactions which have actually been drawn-up by themselves, and/or by their agents.
Piles of independent witness evidence is available on the Net. which reveals that virtually none of the tens of millions of persons around the globe who have been churned through the 'Amway' frauds during the previous 50+ years have even tried to sell 'Amway' wampum to outsiders. A significant minority of these persons were de facto slave recruiters who had been subjected (without their fully-informed consent) to co-ordinated, devious techniques of social, psychological and physical persuasion designed to fulfil the hidden criminal objectives of racketeers by provoking in them an infantile total dependence on the 'Amway' organization to the detriment of themselves and of their existing family, and/or other relationships.
David Brear (Copyright 2010)
2 comments:
Brear,
Is there anything you *can* get right? I haven't worked in academia for well over a decade.
So, let me see. Let's clear this up then shall we?
How about this.
I will get a signed, witnessed, certified statement from one of my customers, whom is neither a relative nor "under contract", that they have purchased Amway products from my Amway business.
In return, you will issue a public apology for your claims that Amway products are "unsaleable" and arrange for all posts claiming this to be deleted.
Fair enough?
BTW, I heard something a while back, it may or may not be true, but I trust my source.
Were you aware that while BERR was prosecuting Amway, with no small nudging from you no doubt, the department itself was actually purchasing Amway cleaning products - as a customer!
So, are you up to the challenge, Brear? I provide a signed certified statement proving a customer sale, you publicly apologise and delete the posts with the false allegations.
Given this involves 3rd parties, for privacy reasons I suggest we nominate a neutral third party to examine the documents and my claim.
I'll let you nominate someone.
Pick me! Pick me! LOL
Post a Comment