Masked IBOFB throwing temper tantrum

Shyam

I observe that now he's become cornered, 'Amway's' kitsch-costumed, character-assassin, Mr. 'IBOFB' (or should that be 'ABOFB' ?) Steadson, has thrown a temper tantrum on your Blog. At first glance, I thought that it was just another typical dose of puerile abuse from Mr. 'Tex' Johnson. Self-evidently, Steadson's latest statements, and related-rhetorical questions, are based on completely unsubstantiated claims (from the 'Amway' Ministry of Truth) regarding the number of insolvent active 'Amway' adherents, and their personal motivation for, currently giving their money to the billionaire bosses, and millionaire under-bosses, of the 'Amway' mob.

Rather suspicious isn't it, that young Mr. Steadson - someone who steadfastly pretends that he's just an honest bloke innocently trying to sell a few household products to his friends and neighbours - should have ready-access to this veritable avalanche of 'Amway' misinformation, and that he should also find the need to spend half his life attempting to broadcast scripted-propaganda to the entire world whilst attempting viciously to character-assassinate any free-thinking individual challenging its authenticity; via his own multiple websites (in various languages) and his constant masked-interventions on Blogs such as Corporate Frauds Watch?

It is also rather suspicious that Mr. Steadson confesses to having attempted to gather intelligence about me. Although, what he states in his most recent comments is typically misleading. In reality, along with Dr. Edward Lottick (former Chairman of the Cult Awareness Network) I registered a private company in the UK, Axiom Books Ltd., which existed on the list of UK companies for several years and which published an academic booklet entitled, 'The Universal Identifying Characteristics of a Cult.' This work remains my exclusive copyright whilst Axiom Books Ltd., which never traded, was voluntarily dissolved.

Contrary to what the squawking 'Amway' Lord Haw Haw pretends, I don't claim to be perfect. I fully-recognise that morality is only what is regarded as an acceptable standard of behaviour by whatever culture we live in. I based my investigation of cultic groups, and their rackets, on quantifiable evidence, and my analysis of this evidence on rules made by democratic institutions defining what is criminal, and/or unethical. Like you Shyam, I didn't invent this evidence or write these rules.

David Brear

IBOFB's closed-logic defence of Amway is childish drivel

Shyam

In his most recent posts, we have the full set of devious, thought-stopping techniques used by the masked 'Amway' Lord Haw Haw, Mr. 'IBOFB' Steadson, in yet another failed attempt to provoke us into anger and distract your readers from reality. However, the position that this painfully-transparent, little squawking 'Amway' propagandist holds, is an absurd lie propagated by a gang of dangerous economic-alchemists.

A growing mountain of irrefutable evidence (in the form of tens of millions of failed 'Amway' contibuting participants in dozens of countries) proves that, for more than half a century, the billionaire bosses of the 'Amway' mob, and their millionaire under-bosses, have operated an (effectively) closed-market swindle with insufficient external revenue to pay the majority of its contributing participants an overall profit. Steadson clutches at the simplistic fact that the multi-billion dollar 'Amway' swindle has not been 100% closed, like a drowning man might clutch at a straw. However, no one disputes that (every now and then) there has been a bit of cash coming into the 'Amway' swindle from the odd sale of overpriced wampum to an unwary member of the public (usually friends or relatives of transient 'Amway' adherents), but this external revenue was insignificant in comparison with the billions of dollars of payments regularly being handed over to the bosses of the 'Amway' mob by their constantly-churning pool of insolvent victims.

Steadson offers not one shred of evidence to support his crack-pot affirmation that the so-called 'Amway MLM' scheme has had a significant and sustainable external source of external revenue during the previous 50+ years. His only way of justifying this absurd lie is to pretend that payments from insolvent 'Amway ' victims themselves represent an external source of revenue, because (despite what it said on tens of millions of annual 'Amway' contracts) the majority of 'Amway'Business Owners' weren't 'Business Owners' at all, they were actually retail customers.

Self evidently, in the adult world of quantifiable reality, Steadson's latest closed-logic defence of the 'Amway'mob is childish drivel.

David Brear

Masked IBOFB offering comic relief

Shyam

The 'Amway' Lord Haw Haw is now offering your readers comic relief, as well as still pretending to extrapolate a sense from what he reads which does not, and cannot, exist in my text.

According to Mr. Steadson, I'm a 'liar' for stating that (for more than 50 years) virtually no member of the public anywhere in the world has voluntarily purchased products, and/or services, from any transient non-salaried commission agent of the 'Amway' organization, because they were maliciously fixed at a quality and price that rendered them (effectively) unsaleable on the open market. Thus, the only money circulating within the so-called 'Amway MLM' scheme could only have come internally via the contributing participants in that scheme, making it a mathematical certainty that the overwhelming majority of these contributing participants could never hope to receive an overall profit.

Mr. Steadson pretends that the word, virtually, reads as'absolutely.'

Even Mr. 'Tex' Johnson accepts that the amount of grossly- overpriced 'Amway' wampum that has recently been sold on to the public in the USA is a pathetic 3-4% (perhaps this figure includes the mountains of untouched 'Amway' junk that has been knocked out at bargain prices on e-bay). However, this virtually non-existent retail activity is itself almost certainly an exaggeration; for each time the activities of the'Amway' mob have been independently investigated (as was the case in the UK) it has been discovered that the overwhelming majority of the organization's active non-salaried commission agents are merely contributing participants in a closed-market swindle, or money circulation scheme, who have been conditioned to believe that trying to retail 'Amway's' grossly-overpriced wampum is a waste of time. Indeed, in the recent UK investigation, more than 90% of active 'Amway' agents (around 30 000 persons) were found not to be attempting to retail this junk at all. The only evidence that any retailing of grossly-overpriced'Amway' wampum to the public was taking place in the UK, came from the minority core-group of deeply-deluded'Amway' adherents who offered unsubstantiated, but highly-convenient, evidence on behalf of their mob's billionaire bosses and millionaire under-bosses.

Apart from his own feigned incapacity to comprehend plain English, Mr. Steadson's evidence for calling me a 'liar,' is his own unsubstantiated, but highly-convenient, little anecdote involving an anonymous female friend (on a visit) who just happened to buy some grossly-overpriced 'Amway' wampum from him, voluntarily.

David Brear

Authentic retail sales of Amway products is an absurd lie

Shyam

The most recent comments posted by two of your resident little flock of intellectually-castrated 'Amway' apologists have proved one thing: mathematics is definitely not their strong suit. Unfortunately for Messrs. 'IBOFB' Steadson and 'Tex'Johnson, when you subtract 32% from 100% you get 68%. In their most recent comments, the pair of them simply went along with the erroneous 78% figure which I gave, despite the fact that this is a well-known mathematical trap.

Futhermore, Mr. Steadson's capacity to read plain unambiguous English, but then pretend to extrapolate a sense from it which does not, and cannot, exist (in that text) is fascinating. In his latest demonstration of this particularly-devious thought-stopping technique, the 'Amway' Lord Haw Haw pretends that I am suggesting that the victims of the 'Amway' swindle have been giving counterfeit money to the bosses of the 'Amway' mob. By what twisted linguistic path Steadson arrived at this deliberately fantastic destination, is virtually impossible to fathom.

Steadson remains unable to refute the simple fact that (for more than 50 years) virtually no member of the public anywhere in the world has voluntarily purchased products, and/or services, from any transient non-salaried commission agent of the 'Amway' organization, because they were maliciously fixed at a quality and price that rendered them (effectively) unsaleable on the open market. Thus, the only money circulating within the so-called 'Amway MLM' scheme could only have come internally via the contributing participants in that scheme, making it a mathematical certainty that the overwhelming majority of these contributing participants could never hope to receive an overall profit. In order for any system of economic exchange to be viable for its participants, it must have a significant and sustainable source of revenue external to the participants themselves. For more than half a century, the billionaire bosses of the 'Amway' mob, and their apologists, have steadfastly pretended that their scheme was economically viable because the money which the scheme generated, derived mainly from authentic retail sales to members of the public. This has always been an absurd lie, but no doubt Mr. Steadson will again endeavour to extrapolate something completely different to what I have just clearly stated.

David Brear

IBOFB arrogantly squawks Amway's inflexible script

Shyam

Yet again, when cornered, the arrogant and inflexible 'Amway'Lord Haw Haw, Mr. 'IBOFB' Steadson, has resorted to his tedious 'Scientology'-style provocation tactics. Unfortunately, for an aspiring young 'Amway' sophist trained to address directly (in familiar terms) all persons challenging his group's deeply-flawed logic, and who steadfastly pretends absolute intellectual authority, spelling common English words does not appear to be Mr. Steadson's strong suit. One would have thought that (with all their stolen wealth) the bosses of the 'Amway' mob, and their millionaire under-bosses, would have been able to find a chief Internet propagandist of a slightly higher calibre.

As predicted, the painfully-transparent Mr. Steadson cannot produce one shred of evidence (other than his group's scripted-lies) to prove that (during 50+ years) the so-called 'Amway MLM' scheme has had a significant and sustainable source of revenue other than an endless chain of its own contantly-churning contributing participants. Amazingly, the 'Amway' Lord Haw Haw is still attempting to hide behind essentially the same, thin pseudo-economic smoke-screen as Bernie Madoff. Indeed, it beggars belief that, in defence of the billionaire bosses of the 'Amway'mob, Mr. Steadson is now actually boasting that (during 2009) 32% of the overall $8.4 billions annual take (arbitrarily defined as 'sales') from 'Amway's' camouflaged closed-market swindle, was paid back to a tiny minority of the several millions persons from whence it originally came. The remaining 68% of the take, which (without sufficient retail sales to the public) can only have originated from the victims of a classic closed-market swindle, Mr. Steadson steadfastly pretends to have derived from an 'external source.'

It is upon this absurd, but nonetheless pernicious, lie that the entire 'MLM' racket hangs, and hopefully soon will be hanged in India.

Again, we should thank Mr. Steadson; for each time he arrogantly squawks from his group's inflexible script, he's merely pushing the billionaire bosses of the 'Amway' mob, and their millionaire under-bosses, closer to a prison cell.

David Brear

Confused IBOFB wants to divert people's attention from money circulation scheme

After Clueless Tex and Baffled Trivedi, the Confused IBOFB joins the bandwagon of brainless chicken. Otherwise, is he feigning ignorance? Everyone is aware of the 6-4-3 scheme and it could be understood that IBOFB pulling a confused face. Or is he poor in mathematics?

The IBOFB claims to have read the Andhra Pradesh High Court Judgement. The Division Bench quoting the affidavit filed by Amway India itself elaborately touched the scheme and came to conclusion that the business model of Amway India is illegal and attracts the provisions of the Prize Chits & Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act, 1978.

On one hand, the Baffled Trivedi says that there is no bar on the number of distributors to be enrolled and the Confused IBOFB says otherwise. According to him, 6-4-3 means in only 78 people. 6 X 4 = 24 and 24 x 3= 72. 6+24+72= 102 +1(the first distributor) = 103. This is the simple maths, And it goes above the confused IBOFB's head.

According to Trivedi, a distributor could enroll any number of distributors. And which one is true. Is it somewhere in between?

IBOFB no more tricks. Come out open by removing the mask. Why don't you be honest to yourself?

Let us recall the case of GoldQuest International which employed the same trick of selling products i.e. gold medallions. Now the CID has gathered the names of more than 2700 persons who amassed commission of more than Rs. 50,000. It could do well the same technique with the Amway India's money circulation scheme. That is what has been asked in the rejoinder submitted to the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Court.

How much of that money is from external sources

Shyam

I observe that the masked 'Amway' Lord Haw Haw, Mr. 'IBOFB' Steadson, has squawked yet again. However, it's an absolute certainty that the most vociferous member of your resident little flock of intellectually-castrated 'Amway' apologists will not want to qualify Trivedi's simplistic statement that 'Amway has posted record sales of $8.4 billions for 2009.' The billionaire bosses of the 'Amway' mob know full-well that this (apparently) impressive capital sum only has meaning when you factor-in exactly how much of it came from an external source, or sources, to their so-called 'Multilevel Marketing' scheme. For without a significant and sustainable external revenue, what the billionaire bosses of the 'Amway' mob have actually operated (for more than 50 years) can only have been a camouflaged closed-market swindle dependent on an endless chain of recruitment. It is small wonder these sanctimonious racketeers hide behind a vile little gang of apologists and character-assassins who cannot (under any circumstances) disclose the real source of their bosses' stolen wealth.

On the one hand, we have the unchallenged evidence that tens of millions of contributing participants around the world have been churned through the camouflaged 'Amway' closed-market swindle during 50+ years, and that the overwhelming majority couldn't hope to receive one dime of overall profit, because 'Amway' wampum has been maliciously kept at a price and quality which rendered it (effectively) unsaleable to members of the public. In reality, just like thousands of victims of Bernie Madoff, all these millions of would-be 'Amway' millionaires have merely been peddled infinite shares in their own finite money. On the other hand, we have just one faceless 'Amway' propagandist, Mr. Steadson, who (without offering the slightest supporting evidence) steadfastly pretends to have lots of customers beating on his door to buy 'Amway' wampum.

Shyam, again as in the case of Bernie Madoff, there is no way that the billionaire bosses of the 'Amway' mob (for all their stolen wealth) are ever going to come to court voluntarily with any person who knows exactly how the closed-market trick is pulled. The only question that I would want ask them is:

If you cannot prove that your so-called 'MLM' scheme has had significant external revenue, where on Earth, unless you have super-human powers, would all the miraculous money have come from to pay the majority of your participants a profit?

David Brear