Shyam
The most recent comments posted by two of your resident little flock of intellectually-castrated 'Amway' apologists have proved one thing: mathematics is definitely not their strong suit. Unfortunately for Messrs. 'IBOFB' Steadson and 'Tex'Johnson, when you subtract 32% from 100% you get 68%. In their most recent comments, the pair of them simply went along with the erroneous 78% figure which I gave, despite the fact that this is a well-known mathematical trap.
Futhermore, Mr. Steadson's capacity to read plain unambiguous English, but then pretend to extrapolate a sense from it which does not, and cannot, exist (in that text) is fascinating. In his latest demonstration of this particularly-devious thought-stopping technique, the 'Amway' Lord Haw Haw pretends that I am suggesting that the victims of the 'Amway' swindle have been giving counterfeit money to the bosses of the 'Amway' mob. By what twisted linguistic path Steadson arrived at this deliberately fantastic destination, is virtually impossible to fathom.
Steadson remains unable to refute the simple fact that (for more than 50 years) virtually no member of the public anywhere in the world has voluntarily purchased products, and/or services, from any transient non-salaried commission agent of the 'Amway' organization, because they were maliciously fixed at a quality and price that rendered them (effectively) unsaleable on the open market. Thus, the only money circulating within the so-called 'Amway MLM' scheme could only have come internally via the contributing participants in that scheme, making it a mathematical certainty that the overwhelming majority of these contributing participants could never hope to receive an overall profit. In order for any system of economic exchange to be viable for its participants, it must have a significant and sustainable source of revenue external to the participants themselves. For more than half a century, the billionaire bosses of the 'Amway' mob, and their apologists, have steadfastly pretended that their scheme was economically viable because the money which the scheme generated, derived mainly from authentic retail sales to members of the public. This has always been an absurd lie, but no doubt Mr. Steadson will again endeavour to extrapolate something completely different to what I have just clearly stated.
David Brear
5 comments:
Brear,
You type lots of words, but say very little. I think YOU made the math error, and only later caught yourself. LOL
Bottom line, you didn't respond to either of the concepts I presented, as usual.
Brear, you are also an outright liar. You state -
unable to refute the simple fact that (for more than 50 years) virtually no member of the public anywhere in the world has voluntarily purchased products, and/or services, from any transient non-salaried commission agent of the 'Amway' organization
I, and others, have MANY times given you examples of retail sales to the public. It's easy to claim something doesn't exist by choosing to ignore every example of it occurring.
Even your beloved BERR, who fell hook line and sinker for the BS of the likes of you, found that a significant proportion of active IBOs were retailing outside the network. Woodward et.al. vs Quixtar revealed there were tens of millions of dollars a year worth of customer orders going through the Quixtar website in North America alone.
I sold some stuff myself this week, by accident! We ordered an example of the new beautycycle range, for our own use. A friend came to visit and saw the packages - we hadn't even opened them. I explained what it was, she opened them, smelled them, tried them ... asked how much it cost, I told her, she bought them on the spot. We're yet to even try the products ourselves!
Yet here you are again spouting an outright lie, claiming I've never refuted your lie, and here am I refuting it again.
I can guarantee that in a future post you'll again be claiming there's no sales outside the network, and again you'll be lying.
The amount of retail sales in the U.S. is about 3-4%, according to the documentation from the TEAM blowup. Not impressive....
However, the FTC is on record as not particularly caring about the lack of retail sales.
No Tex, that was the number of retails sales recorded by customers through the Quixtar website, not the amount of retail sales.
Even then, it's tens of millions of dollars. That's a lot more than none.
As ex-eagle and others have stated, many of the Quixtar retail sales are LIES. I've even stated on a number of occasions how my upline taught their groups how to "fake out" the computer with false retail sales in order to earn downline bonus volume. Stop your nonsense.
Where does Brear say "none?"
Tens of millions in the context of a billion is very close to none, especially when even the tens of millions is suspect. STOP YOUR LYING!!!
Post a Comment