The easiest thing in the world is to convince yourself that you are right. The Amway apologists do the same thing. The IBO who did personal sales worth Rs. 4,500 and enrolled his downline members cannot claim that all the sales did by those members as his own. Then the downline members have nothing to claim as their own sales. If they claim again that amounts double jeopardy.
My fight is against all types of these fraudsters whether they are Indian crooks or from abroad.
Let us move forward ignoring these comments. For the personal sales of Rs. 4,500 at Stage-1, each IBO would make Rs. 56,925 per month and the Stage-2 IBO would make Rs. 9,540 and the Stage-3 IBO would make Rs. 1980 and the Stage-4 IBo would make only Rs. 1035 per month.
Moreover, if an IBO fails in any month to make such purchase, he will be denied the applicable bonuses and commissions for that month on the downline volume which will then most unfairly pass on to the next eligible upline IBO who satisfied this requirement of personal purchase in that month.
The provisions of the Indian Contract Act prohibits unlawful enrichment of one at the cost of many. Being the promoters, the initial members or uplines to the majority members into the scheme get easy and quick money without any effort. Thus they are unlawfully enriching themselves at the cost of innocent distributors downline.
Therefore, a substantial part of the income which the first sponsor member of the group gets indubitably depends upon the event or contingency relative of the enrollment of members into the scheme downline. This can only be stated to be easy and quick earned by its distributors.
My fight is against all types of these fraudsters whether they are Indian crooks or from abroad.
Let us move forward ignoring these comments. For the personal sales of Rs. 4,500 at Stage-1, each IBO would make Rs. 56,925 per month and the Stage-2 IBO would make Rs. 9,540 and the Stage-3 IBO would make Rs. 1980 and the Stage-4 IBo would make only Rs. 1035 per month.
Moreover, if an IBO fails in any month to make such purchase, he will be denied the applicable bonuses and commissions for that month on the downline volume which will then most unfairly pass on to the next eligible upline IBO who satisfied this requirement of personal purchase in that month.
The provisions of the Indian Contract Act prohibits unlawful enrichment of one at the cost of many. Being the promoters, the initial members or uplines to the majority members into the scheme get easy and quick money without any effort. Thus they are unlawfully enriching themselves at the cost of innocent distributors downline.
Therefore, a substantial part of the income which the first sponsor member of the group gets indubitably depends upon the event or contingency relative of the enrollment of members into the scheme downline. This can only be stated to be easy and quick earned by its distributors.
2 comments:
If I understand this correctly, owning ANY business with employees would be illegal, since there will be management, and business owners, earning income based on the "work of the many?"
And it would also appear that virtually every other distribution company engages in "double jeopardy" since, for example, both Coca-Cola and the local store selling Coca-Cola will count the same can of Coke in it's revenues.
Of course, neither is true, your clutching at increasingly ephemeral straws ....
corret... this person is either failed in business or he never applied his common sense to learn how money comes thru this business
Post a Comment