Shyam
I think it must be perfectly obvious (to anyone with fully-functioning critical faculties) that the billionaire bosses of the 'Amway' mob seek to maintain an unofficial presence on any Website that challenges the authenticity of their counterfeit 'commercial' activities.
Curious, isn't it, how the provocative 'Amway' Lord Haw Haw, Mr. Steadson, finds it so important to keep appearing on your Blog and to continue to try to character- assassinate us. He has now surpassed himself. For obvious reasons, despite all circumstantial evidence to the contrary, Steadson is still steadfastly pretending that he acts independently of the 'Amway' mob. His latest little intellectually-castrated offering on your Blog is perhaps the most absurd, but nonetheless arrogant, defence of racketeering I've ever encountered. It makes me wonder which dunce with a diploma at the 'Amway' Ministry of Truth fashioned this particular linguistically- inaccurate bullet for Steadson to shoot into his own foot?
I'm not imagining this, am I Shyam? Steadson really does ask us:
'If 80-90 % of the people purchasing Amway products were customers why would you continue to find fault with it?'
When translated into plain English, the masked character-assassin is accepting that he cannot refute all the evidence which proves that, for more than half a century, virtually none of the capital assets which the billionaire bosses of the 'Amway' mob have acquired absolute control of, have come from a source, or sources, other than the pockets of the tens of millions of transient contributing participants in their mathematically-impossible so-called 'Business Opportunity,' whom they have arbitrarily, and falsely, defined as 'Distributors' and 'Independent Business Owners.' Thus, Steadson's latest crackpot position is to suggest that I'm being unreasonable for refusing to accept that 50 + years of racketeering should now be completely ignored, because the 'Amway' mob are graciously offering to stop calling the victims of their swindle 'Distributors' and 'Independent Business Owners,' and, instead, rechristen them 'Customers.'
Like I said before, when you know the scale of human misery that has been inflicted behind all this reality-inverting 'Amway' jargon, it's enough to make any decent person want to vomit.
David Brear
I think it must be perfectly obvious (to anyone with fully-functioning critical faculties) that the billionaire bosses of the 'Amway' mob seek to maintain an unofficial presence on any Website that challenges the authenticity of their counterfeit 'commercial' activities.
Curious, isn't it, how the provocative 'Amway' Lord Haw Haw, Mr. Steadson, finds it so important to keep appearing on your Blog and to continue to try to character- assassinate us. He has now surpassed himself. For obvious reasons, despite all circumstantial evidence to the contrary, Steadson is still steadfastly pretending that he acts independently of the 'Amway' mob. His latest little intellectually-castrated offering on your Blog is perhaps the most absurd, but nonetheless arrogant, defence of racketeering I've ever encountered. It makes me wonder which dunce with a diploma at the 'Amway' Ministry of Truth fashioned this particular linguistically- inaccurate bullet for Steadson to shoot into his own foot?
I'm not imagining this, am I Shyam? Steadson really does ask us:
'If 80-90 % of the people purchasing Amway products were customers why would you continue to find fault with it?'
When translated into plain English, the masked character-assassin is accepting that he cannot refute all the evidence which proves that, for more than half a century, virtually none of the capital assets which the billionaire bosses of the 'Amway' mob have acquired absolute control of, have come from a source, or sources, other than the pockets of the tens of millions of transient contributing participants in their mathematically-impossible so-called 'Business Opportunity,' whom they have arbitrarily, and falsely, defined as 'Distributors' and 'Independent Business Owners.' Thus, Steadson's latest crackpot position is to suggest that I'm being unreasonable for refusing to accept that 50 + years of racketeering should now be completely ignored, because the 'Amway' mob are graciously offering to stop calling the victims of their swindle 'Distributors' and 'Independent Business Owners,' and, instead, rechristen them 'Customers.'
Like I said before, when you know the scale of human misery that has been inflicted behind all this reality-inverting 'Amway' jargon, it's enough to make any decent person want to vomit.
David Brear
1 comment:
Brear,
I agree, this is a stupid idea. But hey, we're talking about ibofb, right? LOL
Post a Comment