Shyam
I observe that Lord Haw Haw, Steadson, has raised his masked head again to squawk. This time he put his foot in his beak and surpassed himself in his capacity to invert quantifiable reality and systematically categorize the truth and truth-tellers as 'lies' and 'liars'.
No one can dispute that, for decades, the 'Amway' Ministry of Truth has proudly proclaimed 'millions of Independent Business Owners' world-wide (including '450 000 in India') conducting 'multi-billion dollar sales.' However, since (according to 'Amway's' own figures) around 50% of these people never renewed their annual contracts, this means that down the years tens of millions of individuals have been quietly churned through the ever-shifting 'Amway' system. Again, no one (not even the 'Amway' Lord Haw Haw) disputes that, for 50 years, virtually no 'Amway' products have been retailed to anyone who is not an agent of 'Amway' and that the overwhelming majority of people who have signed a contract with 'Amway' have received not one cent of overall profit from the operation of a so-called 'Amway Business.' On the contrary, involvement with 'Amway' has cost them money.
Despite the efforts of the 'Amway' mob's echelon of attorneys to maintain the organization's absolute monopoly of information, the Internet (particularly e-bay) is constantly infested with thousands of former 'Amway' adherents trying to unload (effectively) unsaleable 'Amway' rubbish at a fraction of the controlled price which they originally paid for it. However, in a desperate attempt to prove that 'Amway' is not an unviable, and illegal, closed-market (a money circulation scheme camouflaged by banal, but grossly-overpriced, products), Steadson has revealed himself to be a complete twit. In fact, judging by this latest ridiculous performance, I can't believe that the billionaire bosses of the 'Amway' mob will allow him to continue for much longer. For Steadson now boasts that the vast majority of all the tens of millions of transient contributors to the 'Amway' closed-market whom, for 50 years, the 'Amway' Ministry of Truth have proudly proclaimed as 'Independent Business Owners' weren't actually in 'Business' at all, they were really 'customers.' Unfortunately for Steadson, it never said that in their 'Amway' contracts. All these tens of millions of people were all arbitrarily and maliciously defined as 'Business Owners' by the billionaire bosses of the 'Amway' mob in order to avoid investigation and criminal prosecution under US federal laws prohibiting closed market swindles a.k.a. pyramid scams. Thus, the 'Amway' Lord Haw Haw has painted himself into a corner where he has been obliged to accept that decades of 'Amway Business Owner Contracts' were lies.
In other words, Steadson has just inadvertently broadcast to the world that the bosses of the 'Amway' mob have been committing crime for 50 years, because lying to people in order to take their money is fraud which is a form of theft.
The 'Amway' Lord Haw Haw will, of course, now compound his offence by totally denying what he has said whilst accusing me of 'ranting, twisting his words and denying reality.'
David Brear
I observe that Lord Haw Haw, Steadson, has raised his masked head again to squawk. This time he put his foot in his beak and surpassed himself in his capacity to invert quantifiable reality and systematically categorize the truth and truth-tellers as 'lies' and 'liars'.
No one can dispute that, for decades, the 'Amway' Ministry of Truth has proudly proclaimed 'millions of Independent Business Owners' world-wide (including '450 000 in India') conducting 'multi-billion dollar sales.' However, since (according to 'Amway's' own figures) around 50% of these people never renewed their annual contracts, this means that down the years tens of millions of individuals have been quietly churned through the ever-shifting 'Amway' system. Again, no one (not even the 'Amway' Lord Haw Haw) disputes that, for 50 years, virtually no 'Amway' products have been retailed to anyone who is not an agent of 'Amway' and that the overwhelming majority of people who have signed a contract with 'Amway' have received not one cent of overall profit from the operation of a so-called 'Amway Business.' On the contrary, involvement with 'Amway' has cost them money.
Despite the efforts of the 'Amway' mob's echelon of attorneys to maintain the organization's absolute monopoly of information, the Internet (particularly e-bay) is constantly infested with thousands of former 'Amway' adherents trying to unload (effectively) unsaleable 'Amway' rubbish at a fraction of the controlled price which they originally paid for it. However, in a desperate attempt to prove that 'Amway' is not an unviable, and illegal, closed-market (a money circulation scheme camouflaged by banal, but grossly-overpriced, products), Steadson has revealed himself to be a complete twit. In fact, judging by this latest ridiculous performance, I can't believe that the billionaire bosses of the 'Amway' mob will allow him to continue for much longer. For Steadson now boasts that the vast majority of all the tens of millions of transient contributors to the 'Amway' closed-market whom, for 50 years, the 'Amway' Ministry of Truth have proudly proclaimed as 'Independent Business Owners' weren't actually in 'Business' at all, they were really 'customers.' Unfortunately for Steadson, it never said that in their 'Amway' contracts. All these tens of millions of people were all arbitrarily and maliciously defined as 'Business Owners' by the billionaire bosses of the 'Amway' mob in order to avoid investigation and criminal prosecution under US federal laws prohibiting closed market swindles a.k.a. pyramid scams. Thus, the 'Amway' Lord Haw Haw has painted himself into a corner where he has been obliged to accept that decades of 'Amway Business Owner Contracts' were lies.
In other words, Steadson has just inadvertently broadcast to the world that the bosses of the 'Amway' mob have been committing crime for 50 years, because lying to people in order to take their money is fraud which is a form of theft.
The 'Amway' Lord Haw Haw will, of course, now compound his offence by totally denying what he has said whilst accusing me of 'ranting, twisting his words and denying reality.'
David Brear
11 comments:
dear shyam u can't claim any figure regarding the retail sales.
There are people who are having good business always have 5-10 customers who just buy the products from ibo for retail purpose only.
And what are u saying ...
"Again, no one (not even the 'Amway' Lord Haw Haw) disputes that, for 50 years, virtually no 'Amway' products have been retailed to anyone who is not an agent of 'Amway' and that the overwhelming majority of people who have signed a contract with 'Amway' have received not one cent of overall profit from the operation of a so-called 'Amway Business.'"
Signing business is does not mean buying share of amway. Amway is private organisation.
walmart for instance does not give profit to its store owners for just having their stores. The income of the store owners ultimately depends upon sales
i told u david steadson i was right!!!
Brear,
Now that I've talked with Shyam and proven him to be an idiot, it's your turn, Brear. Let's talk, unless you want to prove to all the readers you claim read this blog that you're too chicken. LOL
Tex, the stupid, idiot and cluless, of course all are his surnames. He claims that he had proved something while talking to me. All he talked was highly idiotic and his question was more idiotic. He proved himself a pigheaded. I chastised him not lose his tongue. But he is back to his original self. That is why I too have to call him names. His question was if the Amway products were sold half the price, is it still money circulation scheme. I told him as long as the products are not sold in the open market it is still and if they are that quality, they could sell them in the open market. The business model is illegal and I made it abundantly clear to him. He is such a pigheaded fellow and timid fellow, he did not even reveal his name while making phone call. That type of chickenheads are Amway apologists.
shyam could let us know according to u what is closed end market or open end market.
so that i can address to ur question more clearly
Shyam,
I was waiting for you to put it in writing. By definition, if Amway products cost less than comparable products in the market place, it CAN'T be a money circulation scheme. LOL
I explained why the products aren't allowed in stores, it's to level the playing field for all IBOs. LOL
The MLM business model is approved in virtually every country, yet you and Brear continue to squawk "money circulation scheme, money circulation scheme!" LOL
As I said on the phone the Amway tool scam is a MUCH larger problem. LOL
I'm fairly sure that if Amway thought they could sell their products in an open market and make more money, it would be a wise business decision to do so.
But what can be better than a group of comissioned sales people who receive no benefits?
I'm fairly sure that if Amway thought they could sell their products in an open market and make more money, it would be a wise business decision to do so. ---- I'm more than fairly sure you don't have a clue WHY Rich & Jay started the Amway business. LOL
But what can be better than a group of comissioned sales people who receive no benefits? ---- Aren't commissions benefits? LOL
Rich and Jay started the business 50 years ago. Do you think people should still sell Amway door to door with a radio flyer?
Yes, comissions are compensation but a regular salaried employee would receive other benefits such as medical insurance and vacation and/or sick leave. A comission only sales person (aka IBO) is the cheapest way to move your products. Of course it sounds better to be called an IBO than a comission only sales person right?
Rich and Jay started the business 50 years ago. Do you think people should still sell Amway door to door with a radio flyer? ---- Just as I said, you're CLUELESS. Very few people probably used a radio flyer to sell products 50 years ago. Nice try to get off the original question.
Yes, comissions are compensation but a regular salaried employee would receive other benefits such as medical insurance and vacation and/or sick leave. A comission only sales person (aka IBO) is the cheapest way to move your products. Of course it sounds better to be called an IBO than a comission only sales person right? ---- Traditional business owners don't receive employee benefits from an employer either. What's your point?
Post a Comment