Thursday 4 February 2010

Trivedi could not comprehend plain English

Shyam
Imagine, if Bernie Madoff had been challenged by his victims in the exactly same way that I advised young Trivedi to challenge his 'Amway' handlers? Imagine, if they'd all got together and demanded that Madoff answer the following, simple question:
Over the last several years, what percentage (by value) of 'Madoff Investments' perpetually-expanding , multi-billion dollar Hedge Fund' have actually derived from persons who are not investors themselves?
In reality, Madoff was challenged by a few of his victims just before he confessed to federal law enforcement agents that the only cash that there had ever been in his miraculous 'Hedge Fund', was secretly that of his victims. In the months prior to his arrest, Madoff was still confidently spouting the same precisely-worded lies and pointing to a long list of 'independent sources' (including The Wall Street Journal) to back him up. In reality, for more than a decade, a whole flock of (apparently well-educated) financial journalists had simply repeated Madoff's 'multi-billion dollar' fairytale (without the slightest qualification). Apparently, it never occurred to these dunces with diplomas to dig deeper and ask the mercurial Mr. Madoff for some proof that he was, in fact, telling the truth.
Trivedi again fails to comprehend plain English. Self-evidently, I didn't ask him any questions at all, because we all know that he doesn't have the beginnings of clue what the answers are. I merely suggested that the poor little lad put his hand up and ask his 'Amway' handlers some vey specific questions which, just like Bernie Madoff, they cannot answer directly. However, Trivedi has revealed that he accepts that 'Amway' makes no distinction in its published 'multi-billion dollar sales figures' between internal ('wholesale') transactions and external ('retail') transactions. This is rather remarkable, considering the fact that, in 1979 (in order to avoid criminal prosecution), 'Amway's' lawyers promised the US Federal Trade Commission that no 'Amway' commission agents would qualify to receive bonus payments unless they could prove that they were retailing the overwhelming majority (by value) of their own purchases on to persons who were not agents of 'Amway'. At this time, the FTC (with a naivety that beggars belief) trusted the bosses of the 'Amway' mob to put their own shifty edifice in order.
David Brear

5 comments:

dtytrivedi said...

dear shyam i am requesting you

"Over the last several years, what percentage (by value) of 'Amway's' published 'multi-billion dollar sales' have actually been to persons who are not agents of the organization?"

Yes i didn't understood it, ok now happy?

I am serious about it, it would be good for me if you let me know. I will learn something from you?

dtytrivedi said...

regarding to your statment

" However, Trivedi has revealed that he accepts that 'Amway' makes no distinction in its published 'multi-billion dollar sales figures' between internal ('wholesale') transactions and external ('retail') transactions. "

looks like u didn't get my point. But don't worry i am not like you that for not understanding my point i will not write the whole page on commenting that shyam should improve his english.

Read it again

Until 1999 sales were reported at Estimated Retail.
This is approximately 32% higher than actual sales revenues from sales made to Amway distributors.

In 2000, Amway was restructed to become a part of holding company Alticor. Alticor and Quixtar sales data is reported as actual sales (which is wholesale sales).

So from 2000 it is showing wholesale sales and not the retail sales.

Does other retail companies like unilever or procter and gamble takes RRP into consideration in their sales revenue?

the answer of this will make u understand what my point is

Tex said...

Brear/Shyam,

What percentage of Sam's Club and Costco products were bought by non-members? LOL

Oh my GOSH, those stores MUST be scams, because you have to be an "investor" to buy products there, and they don't even pay out MLM bonuses. LOL What a scam! LOL LOL LOL

Joecool said...

Tex is a dumbfuck. Costco IS a buyer's club, it ISN'T a business opportunity.

Dytrivedi, what you should wonder is why the customers of Amway goods are primarily IBOs. If Amway goods were of superior value, why don't more people buy them?

If you didn't think you would make an income from Amway, would you still be seeking to purchase them?

Tex said...

jc is a dumbfuck (and a liar, and a whore mongerer). Costco IS a buyer's club, it ISN'T a business opportunity.

Dytrivedi, what you should wonder is why the customers of Amway goods are primarily non-IBOs in Amway's largest market, China. If Amway goods were of superior value, why don't more people buy them in the U.S.? Answer: Because the LCKs make FAR more money from the tool scam, and if IBOs spend their limited time retailing, there isn't as much left over to consume the ATS (Amway Tool Scam). Add stupid to jc's list! LOL

If you didn't think you would make an income from Amway, would you still be seeking to purchase them? Answer: I've found several customers with that EXACT level of interest. LOL