Amway's dreamers still continue to dream

One Ananta Padmanabha Swami from Madanapalli writes that he has been well motivated by Raja Naren to become an Amway distributor. He claims to be a taxi driver and a dreamer. However, he did not say how much amount he is investing every month to purchase products and how much commission he is earning. He is all praise of Raja Naren, a Diamond, but he was not clear whether he is working for him or a mere admirer. It is hoped that the dreamer would wake up some day and realise the futile exercise of dreaming.

At the disrupted venue of Amway meeting at Vijayawada, a newly joined distributor said that he became a distributor by paying Rs. 1000 and he is purchasing products worth Rs. 1000 and earning a commission of Rs. 60. When asked he said that he would have to purchase products worth Rs. 18,000 to earn a commission of Rs. 1000. He just smiled when asked what he would do with products worth Rs. 18,000 every month.

Now the Clueless Tex, the stupid, asks what is the evidence of the new distributor. He is such a nitwit he could ask any question. Anyway, it seems Tex, the stupid did not make a phone call to the police officer to verify veracity of the 'story'.

Masked IBOFB uses the same tedious tactics

Shyam

The masked 'Amway' Lord Haw Haw, Mr. 'IBOFB' Steadson, is (as ever) using the same tedious and transparent tactics. However, it turns out, that these go back centuries.

In Steadson's latest intellectually-feeble post, he again endeavours to extrapolate a simplistic meaning from what I have clearly stated on your Blog which does not, and cannot, exist (in that unambiguous text). To this twisted end, Mr. Steadson pretends that I believe that the police must be to blame if laws are broken which they do not enforce. What I actually believe is that any individual, including Mr. Steadson, who has been part of the pattern of major racketeering activity lurking behind the kitsch corporate front of 'Amway,' is a criminal who should be held to account for his/her crimes.

As Steadson knows full-well, the employees of the mystifying labyrinth of corporate structures most-commonly referred to as 'Amway,' are neither democratically-accountable nor are they law enforcement agents. The self-appointed billionaire bosses of the 'Amway' mob have simply created their own reality-inverting 'rules' for the benefit of public consumption. When the wider-picture is examined, these documents are revealed as being an integral part of the pattern of major racketeering activity lurking behind 'Amway's' kitsch corporate front; for these 'rules' were self-evidently designed to obstruct investigation by appearing (to casual observers, including journalists, law enforcement agents and judges) to have been introduced to keep the activities of 'Amway' adherents within laws made by democratic institutions defining what is criminal, and/or unethical. However, 'Amway's' own 'rules' have not been enforced, because they have always been malicious fakes. Their real hidden purpose was criminal - since they were never meant to be enforced, they were actually designed to authorize the closed-market swindle which (to casual observers) they appear to prohibit. A mountain of witness evidence proves that, in reality (for decades) millions of transient adherents of the 'Amway' myth have been secretly told by their 'Admired and Respected Leaders' to ignore 'Amway's Rules' on the pretext that attempting to retail 'Amway' products is for 'Losers' : 'Winners Duplicate Exactly' a 'Proven Plan' of 'Self-Consumption and Recruitment' - only '100% Positive Belief' in this 'Proven Plan,' can bring 'Total Financial Freedom'.

Unfortunately for Mr. Steadson, it was Cardinal Richelieu who observed:

'To make a law, and not enforce it, is to authorize the thing you would seek to prohibit.'

Interestingly, Richelieu was speaking about sexual activities which, although apparently forbidden by canon law, were actually rife amongst the senior clergy of the Roman Catholic Church during the 17th century. In effect, at that time, the democratically-unaccountable individuals who posed as upstanding legislators and law enforcement agents within the Roman Catholic Church, were secretly the organization's main law breakers.

David Brear

File criminal cases against TVI Express

Mr Madangopal Agarwal wanted to know what to do with the cheating companies like TVI Express. He says that he was cheated by the company.

Actually this TVI Express is indulging in money circulation scheme and cheating the gullible in many countries. If Mr Madangopal is from India, he could file a criminal case against that company under the provisions of the Prize Chits and Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act, 1978. If the police did not accept to file the criminal case, Mr Madangopal could file a private complaint against the company in a Metropolitan Magistrate Court and seek directions to the police to file the criminal case against that company.

There have been a number of unscrupulous companies sprouting all over country cheating the public with smooth talk and inducement to become rich in a short span. All these companies take cue from the mother of all scams, Amway. The victims realise only after losing their hard-earned money. Still, they prefer not to file a complaint with the police. At least they could come out openly against such companies and write to the newspapers and authorities about the fraudulent practices of these companies. Then only the government authorities and the police would take action.

My dear fellow humans! Do not believe these smooth-talking con men and fall prey to their schemes -- be it binary or 6-4-3. Do not lose your hard-earned money.

Amway mob produces meaningless 'rule book'

Shyam

The classic tactic of all reality-inverting, abusive cultic groups, is to blame their victims using closed-logic. In his latest particularly-feeble post, the masked 'Amway' Lord Haw Haw, Mr.'IBOFB' Steadson, has given your readers another typical demonstration of this ignoble cultic art. Like all cult apologists, he has absolutely no concern for the suffering of his group's victims and their relatives.

The (apparently independent) corporate structures which comprise the major organized crime group most-commonly referred to as 'Amway,' have concocted all manner of visible'rules' and 'codes of conduct' which, to casual observers (including judges, journalists and law enforcement agents), can appear to keep these structures' activities within laws made by democratic institutions defining what is criminal, and/or unethical. When the wider picture is examined, the 'Amway Rule Book' is revealed as part of the organization's reality-inverting smoke-screen; for, in practise, it cannot be (and has not been) enforced, whilst a mountain of witness testimony from former 'Amway' adherents proves that (no matter what Mr. Steadson pretends) millions of individuals over a period of 50+ years have been secretly taught to duplicate exactly the 100% Positive Example of their 'Admired and Respected Leaders,' and to ignore 'Amway's' rules (particularly about retailing) as the 'Proven Plan to Achieve Total Financial Freedom'.

In exactly this way, the late Mr.Venugopal was obviously deceived into buying significant quantities of (effectively ) unsaleable 'Amway' wampum, leaving his widow, Mrs. Sujata, in severe financial distress. Predictably, in order to evade prosecution for fraud, the corporate officers of 'Amway India Enterprises' have produced their meaningless 'Rule Book' like a rabbit out of a hat. They now point to this highly-convenient counterfeit and steadfastly pretend that, by purchasing all these world-class 'Amway' products and lying about having retailed them (in order to qualify for commission payments), the late Mr. Venugopal was in breach of 'Amway's Rules.' Obviously, this is a perfect illustration of how a cultic group blames its victims. The fact that Mr. Steadson uses this tactic in his latest post, falsely stating that the late Mr. Venugopal is responsible for his widow's present situation, is yet more proof that Steadson is the vile little foot-soldier of racketeers who has attempted to obstruct justice on their behalf on countless occasions.

The puerile and abusive, Mr. Scott 'Tex' Johnson, systematically refuses to accept the testimony of persons like Mrs. Sujata who have been adversely effected by the 'Amway' mob's criminal activities in India. However, even he has to accept that (for 12 years), as an unquestioning core-adherent of the closed-logic 'Amway' myth, he was subjected to a devious program of totalitarian 'positive versus negative' indoctrination (disguised as'training and motivation') which (effectively) coerced him into committing fraud in the USA on behalf of the billionaire bosses, and millionaire under-bosses of the 'Amway' mob.

David Brear

Clueless Tex proves what he is

Clueless Tex, the stupid, strongly believes that every one is a liar because he is a born liar. He never believes even in his dream that people could be honest and truthful. His reaction to the earlier post on Amway reflected his original self. The confused IBOFB asked a sensible question. The whole episode is divided into two parts. One pertains to the grievance of Ms Sujata and the other is the complaint lodged by the Corporate Frauds Watch.

It is easy to find out through his co-apologists whatever happened to the grand meet at Vijayawada. Why Mr William Pinckney returned on the same flight without participating in the meeting. Instead of finding out the truth, the Faceless, Spineless, Brainless Tex simply says that it is a story.

IBOFB should ask himself the question whether there is anyone who follows rules set by Amway. The famous ENT surgeon from Vijayawada prescribes Amway's dietary supplements to his patients.

Tex, the stupid, check the incident with your fellow apologists and find out the truth. Ms Bhavani, the area manager of Amway India along with some distributors was kept in the Machavaram police station in Vijayawada till late night and finally let off after slapping a minor case. It seems Tex, the stupid is taking advantage of my open blog and squawking whatever he wants. Just learn the truth, only truth, nothing but truth.

Amway India chief Mr Pinckney virtually chased out

Why did Amway India chief Mr William Pinckney and Diamond Raja Naren run away from Vijayawada without participating in the much-publicised India Success 2010 meet at a college auditorium on Saturday. The obvious reason - Police chased them out.

It all started when an Amway victim, Mrs. Bitra Sujata approached the office-bearers of Amway India at Vijayawada with the plea that Amway India should refund the Rs. 3 lakh (Rs Three Hundred Thousand) which was spent by her late husband, Mr Venugopal to purchase products. The Amway India bluntly refused to take back the stock.

Hurt by the rejection, Ms Sujata pleaded with Amway officials that after husband died, she was not in a position to sell the products and that she is in a financial distress and badly in need of money. When nobody heard her, she approached an advocate, Mr Madanmohan Choudary who in turn contacted the Corporate Frauds Watch. A criminal case of cheating and money circulation scheme was filed against Amway India.

Mrs Sujata took the opportunity to raise the subject when the Amway India announced the grand meeting. Corporate Frauds Watch took up the matter and contacted the police officials. The police officials promptly reacted and disrupted the meeting chasing away the members from the venue. They have even removed the flexi boards, festoons and other publicity material from the venue and dumped them at the police station.

Mr Pinckney who alighted the King Fisher Airlines plane at Gannavaram airport was compelled to return on the same flight to Hyderabad without participating in the meeting only to dodge the police grilling. Raja Naren also took the same course of action.

Police said that the organisers of the meeting did not take permission for conducting the meet and that is the reason it was disrupted. If any victim comes out with allegations of money circulation scheme, they are ready to file more criminal cases against the company, the police asserted.

Amway's business model is counterfeit commercial scheme

Shyam

As 'Joecool' rightly observes on his own Blog, what the billionaire bosses of the 'Amway' mob have got away with running for the previous 50+ years, can be called a 'pyramid,' but the 'Amway' pyramid cannot be described as lawful (and certainly not in India). In truth, since WWII, American-spawned pyramid fraud has been a constantly-evolving criminogenic phenomenon which, for many reasons (not least, widespread political corruption), has been allowed to evade serious criminal prosecution and infect the rest of the globe. It is as a result of US legislators and prosecutors failing to recognise this extremely dangerous development, that this shameful situation has come about. The wider evidence (including tens of millions of individuals who have wasted their time and money) proves beyond all reasonable doubt that 'Amway,' and its many 'MLM'copy-cats, have always been intrinsic frauds, but maliciously designed to infiltrate traditional culture, escape all less-than-intellectually-rigorous investigation and, thus, be sustainable.

It beggars belief that, when 'Amway' was originally challenged in the 1970s by the Federal Trade Commission as being an intrinsic fraud, a US administrative judge limply accepted asevidence the organization's own reality-inverting claims abouthow lawful its future activities would be, rather than only examining what had actually occurred.

US legislators have yet to accept the self-evident truth that pyramid fraud, no matter how heavily it is camouflaged, is always based on essentially the same economic fallacy - that a counterfeit commercial scheme (i.e. an unviable system of economic exchange without any significant, and sustainable, source of revenue other than that derived from its own contributing participants) can lawfully generate endless profits for the majority of its existing contributing participants, provided the scheme continues to find more contributing participants.Tellingly, the billionaire bosses of the 'Amway' mob have spent decades investing a proportion of their considerable ill-gotten gains to steer the legislative debate (in various countries) away from the essential identifying 'closed-market' characteristic of the absurd pyramid fraud which they have run. To this end, their apologists have created all manner of thought-stopping sophistic arguments which can appear to less-than-intellectually-rigorous observers (including legislators and law enforcement agents) to prove that 'MLM' is a perfectly lawful commercial enterprise that has had a significant and sustainable source of external revenue.

Lately, when cornered with the wider evidence, 'Amway'apologists steadfastly pretend that the majority of contributing 'Amway' participants weren't contributing participants at all, they were actually retail customers. This absurd, legalistic inversion of reality, is a comic-book license to steal from the rest of humanity which the billionaire bosses of the 'Amway' mob have awarded themselves.

David Brear