Thursday, 7 January 2010
Amway apologists have nothing to say except LoL
Wednesday, 6 January 2010
Evidence shows Glister's actual price is Rs. 16 only

It has been mentioned several times, that the Amway India has been paying Sales Tax on Glister Toothpaste on its ex-factory price of Rs. 16/ (Rupees Sixteen only). But the retail price of the Glister Toothpaste is Rs. 120. It has been stated several times that the Amway India is indulging in money circulation scheme by selling its products at an exorbitant price and sharing the booty. Here is the statement from the Sales Tax Department obtained under Right to Information Act. The clinching evidence shows that the ex-factory price of Glister Toothpaste is only Rs. 16/. Who are sharing the extra amount collected from the retail sales? Even if the IBOs are given 21 % discount, it is highly priced and the the money is being circulated illegally to the top level members with Amway taking the Lion's share. Some hard-core adherents may argue that it is only tool scam. But the evidence suggests otherwise. Is it enough for the Amway apologists? Do they need more?
I appeal to the people all over world to realise the fact and throw these crook companies like Amway, Herbalife, Tupperware, Hindustan Unilever Network, Forever Living Products et al.
Hard-core fanatics are there in every cult, Amway no exception
Well there we have it (in all its tragic absurdity), the ongoing saga of Mr. Scott E. Johnson alias 'Tex' - a strangely-pathetic, but nonetheless arrogant, middle-aged, white American Protestant male who, in defence of his fragile ego, has persisted (for 17 years) in handing his time and money to the billionaire bosses, and millionaire under-bosses, of the 'Amway' mob. Typically, these cultic racketeers have taken control of Johnson's thinking and behaviour by building an irrational fear in his mind that if he abandons 'Amway' completely and goes to law enforcement agents, journalists, legislators, etc., to confess that he's been defrauded and used to defraud others, he will be forever branded as a 'Quitter and Complainer.' It makes me wonder what sensitive personal information Johnson has previously disclosed to his 'Amway' handlers to enable them to penetrate so deeply into his personality.
Johnson's obsequious letter to Richard DeVos of 2005, in which he insists that he is neither 'Quitter' nor 'Complainer,' not only reveals the irrational mind-set of cult core-adherents, but also demonstrates how their unconditional deference can only serve to confirm and magnify their leaders' own delusions. Indeed, it's not difficult to see how wealthy cultic racketeers (like the De Vos and Van Andel clans) can come to believe themselves to be omnipotent when, even after decades of heartless abuse and exploitation, certain victims still crawl to them and lick their boots like obedient dogs seeking a pat on the head.
If Scott Johson had any real courage, and/or strength of character, I think he would probably have come completely out of the 'Amway' kennel years ago.
Sadly, history proves that in every cult there are always a hard-core of fanatics who would rather die than make the effort to think for themselves.
David Brear
Tex' wrote to Amway boss laugh-a-minute letter
Sunday, 3 January 2010
Herbalife cheats hide behind positive thinking
Reduced prices is admission of guilt and a major racketeering activity by Amway
I observe that Mr. Scott 'Tex' Jonhson, the absurd, but nonetheless dangerous, boss of 'Johnson Enterprises' ( a privately-owned, Texas - registered, limited-liability, commercial company - set up to peddle over-priced 'Amway' water-filters) has been making more puerile and abusive comments on your Blog.
Johnson, who (to say the least) has a slight conflict of interest, insists that you, Shyam, will not answer his reasonable questions, such as:
'If Amway products were priced one half of competitive products, would Amway still be a money circulation scheme - Yes or No?'
In the adult world of quantifiable reality, Johnson's carefully-worded drivel makes about as much sense as someone (in December 2007) asking :
'If Madoff Investments Inc. now suddenly starts making authentic profitable Investments, instead of just circulating people's money and pretending to be making profitable investments, would Madoff Investments Inc. still be a money circulation scheme - Yes or No?'
Obviously, Johnson's thought-stopping, loaded-question is designed to obscure the ugly reality that 'Amway' has been the main 'corporate' front for billionaire racketeers who, without the slightest qualm, have run, and shielded, a premeditated closed-market swindle (or money circulation scheme) for half a century, camouflaged by (effectively unsaleable) products.
Like Bernie Madoff, these heartless 'Amway' charlatans should be held to account for all the money which they have previously stolen and for all the countless lives which they have destroyed. Their feeble defense (which they, and their arrogant apologists, have squawked on numerous occasions in the past), that 'Amway' has turned-over a new leaf and lowered its prices to create a viable open-market, is not just an admission of guilt, but also part of a pattern of major racketeering activity.
David Brear