Saturday, 28 January 2012

The 'Amway' Lord Hee Haw continues to bluff

Mr. Steadson a.k.a 'IBOFB,'  still seems unable to comprehend that you have definitively banned him from CFW as the de facto agent of the 'Amway' crime bosses. 
The unmasked 'Amway' Lord Hee Haw has yet again foolishly tried to post a provocative comment on CFW. In this, he is attempting to get your free-thinking readers to believe that if I put one million dollars on the table, only then will he show his winning-hand and produce the quantifiable evidence proving that at least one honest person (himself) has managed to generate an overall net-income lawfully from regularly retailing 'Amway' wampum to the public for a profit.
It's curious, that the arch-bluffer, Mr. Steadson, has only now volunteered to produce the many years of 'Amway'- related income-tax payment-receipts which he has previously implied that he has been withholding (for undisclosed reasons).
In reality, the real challenge has already been formally thrown down many times on this Blog (and internationally) to the billionaire bosses of the 'Amway' mob. To date, these narcissistic racketeers have been unable to prove that a significant number of all the tens of millions of persons who have been churned through their so-called 'MLM income opportunity' during the previous 50+ years, have received one cent of overall, net-income lawfully as a result of regularly retailing significant quantities of over-priced 'Amway' wampum to the public for a profit. 
Indeed, when the 'Amway' crime bosses' multi-billion dollar 'MLM income opportunity' bluff was formally called in California recently, their shyster-attorneys attempted to give the equivalent of $155 millons to a significant group of insolvent victims, in order not to have to lay their employers' losing hand down on a federal court's table for the entire world to see. 
One wonders why (given his claimed winning hand) the 'Amway' Lord Hee Haw didn't offer to turn-up for free in Court in California as a star defence witness?After all, the stakes on that formal occasion were far higher than a mere one million dollars.
David Brear (copyright 2012)


quixtarisacult said...

David, Shyam...

For this 'shyster' Steadson to promote Amway, a verifiable money extracting fraud, make him guilty of 'intent to defraud'? Might one of his Belgium victims bring him before the bar of justice? Or would Sweden be the proper jurisdiction for such a complaint?

nationwide said...

For this 'shyster' Steadson to advance Amway, a absolute money extracting fraud, accomplish him accusable of 'intent to defraud'? Might one of his Belgium victims accompany him afore the bar of justice? Or would Sweden be the able administration for such a complaint?

Outsourcing Accounting