Shyam
As part of his increasingly transparent attempts to character-assassinate me, the masked 'Amway' Lord Haw Haw, Mr. 'IBOFB' Steadson, has foolishly presented your readers with a rather interesting choice.
1). Am I making a false and defamatory statement when I openly say that Mr. David J. Steadson is a supine, intellectual prostitute representing severe and inflexible narcissisticracketeers who have illegally acquired absolute control over billions of dollars whilst steadfastly pretending absolute moral and intellectual authority?
or
2). Is Mr. David J. Steadson making a false and defamatory statement when he hides behind a mask and implies that all free-thinking individuals challenging the authenticy of 'Multilevel Marketing', are merely narcissistic liars who are unconciously projecting the diagnosic criteria of their own mental disorder on to completely innocent business men and women like himself, Alan Kippax, Dexter and Birdie Yager and the members of the DeVos and VanAndel clans?
Tellingly, Mr. Steadson hasn't one shred of quantifiable evidence to support his absurd and indefensible position. We, on the other hand, have a veritable mountain of quantifiable evidence on our side.
Remember, of the tens of millions of constantly-churning individuals who have been deceived into signing a contract with the 'Amway Corporation' during the previous 50+ years, virtually none have received an overall profit from the operation of a so-called 'Independent Amway Business.' In reality, they have all been the ill-informed victims of a series of related-swindles run by cultic racketeers who have continued to enslave vulnerable individuals by peddling them the attractive lie that anyone can achieve total financial freedom in 'Amway' by following a proven plan of recruitment and consumption.
Given the wider evidence, anyone who still genuinely believes that 'Multilevel Marketing' is an authentic 'Business Opportunity', can only be deluded.
David Brear (copyright 2010)
YouTube - Videos from this email
3 comments:
Wow, how many logical fallacies in that post .... 1 ... 2.... damn, I think I'm going to need more fingers ...
Funny how you didn't actually answer my question asking what was wrong in my comments on the Times website.
Anyway ... c'mon Brear, tell me what you do for a living, then I'll decide whether you're worth suing. ;-)
Why won't you answer such a simple question?
You did not answer my simple question IBOFB. Why you are ashamed of your real identity?
I'm not ashamed of my real identity. What would make you think I am?
Why is Brear ashamed of what he does for a living?
C'mon Brear, what do you do for a living?
Post a Comment