The masked 'Amway' Lord Haw Haw , Mr. 'IBOFB' Steadson has actually admitted on your Blog that he was the author of a puerile, false and defamatory comment signed 'David London', posted on the Times Online Website. Therefore, he has half-admitted to you that : yes, he is David Steadson. Notice, that he has never ever denied my identification of him.
I think that we can now safely say that Mr. Steadson is a somewhat transparent narcissistic liar who does not have a'BSc in psychology', nor was he ever studying for a post-graduate qualification in 'sociology' and 'anthropology' whilst working as a 'researcher.' Of course, he could easily prove us wrong by supplying the name of his Alma Mater, but then, what are his former colleagues (if they really exist) going to think of his new career? Personally, I suspect that there is some trace of truth in Mr. Steadson's boasts, which would be typical of a narcissistic liar. They usually spin their webs of lies from strands with which they are familiar.
Mr. Steadson has repeatedly boasted of his alleged academic qualifications, and of his alleged 'Amway Success,' to your readers. Therefore, we have every right to challenge him to prove that these really exist. We, on the other hand, have made no boasts whatsoever. Therefore, Mr. Steadson is actually challenging us to prove the validity of statements that we have never made. Again, this form of aggressive, reality-inverting posturing is typical of a narcissistic liar. In truth, Mr. Steadson behaves like a miserable little creature puffing himself up to fool larger predators.
Mr. Steadson's disturbing Orwellian questions: Who is paying your bills? What's your background? , could have come straight out of 'Nineteen Eighty-Four' (or a 'Scientology' training manual for that matter).
The author of the 'Scientology' myth, L. Ron Hubbard, put forward the Orwellian idea that everyone had committed some crime in their past that they don't want others to know about. Therefore, if 'Scientologists' can only find out what this guilty secret is, they can gain control over absolutely anyone. To this end, when faced with the quantifiable evidence that L. Ron Hubbard was a narcissistic liar and a crook, apologists of 'Scientology' systematically turn these accusations around and steadfastly demand of critics: 'Why are you lying ? What are your crimes?'
Indeed, more correspondents keep suggesting to me that Mr. Steadson appears to have studied 'Scientology' at some time. Even if this is not strictly speaking so, in many respects, as an adherent of 'Amway,' he has.