Tuesday, 27 October 2009

Same old defence put forward by IBOFB

As you know, I have completed extensive research into many camouflaged totalitarian movements (both historic and contemporary), and, based on this research, I have published a comprehensive list of the universal indentifying characteristics of a pernicious, or criminogenic, cult. Without exception, these groups exploit their core-adherents by using various devious techniques of social, psychological and physical persuasion designed to shut down individuals' critical and evaluative faculties without their fully-informed consent. In this way, core-cult adherents can be conditioned to dissipate all their mental, physical and financial resources to the benefit of hitherto unknown persons whom they continue to trust and follow no matter suffering this entails. The quantifiable evidence that this has occurrred over a long period of time, and on a wide scale, within the ranks of 'Amway,' is massive and conclusive. I'm not asking anyone just to take my word; one only has to consult the Internet briefly to confirm the ugly reality I describe.
The sophistic defence now being put forward by Steadson (the de facto agent of the 'Amway' bosses ), is not at all original. In fact, it is frighteningly familiar. In essence, what Steadson is now pretending (on behalf of his bosses) is that within 'Amway' there are certain independent individuals who, and independent groups which, have been involved in unlawful acts of exploitation, and that this independent minority has led biased observers (like myself and Prof. Blakey) to make the mistake of condemning the entire 'Amway' organization as criminogenic. In other words, although he now seems to accept that crimes have been committed behind the corporate front of 'Amway,' Steadson is typically (of a cult apologist) inverting reality by ignoring the suffering of the actual victims whilst putting the grinning billionaire 'Amway' leadership forward as 'innocent victims under attack.'
I have previously stated that this type of familiar, unfeeling, sophistic defence (which is particularly used by the provocative apologists of 'Scientology'), is the equivalent of defending counterfeit bank-notes on the grounds that 'parts of them are OK, so why concentrate on the bits that are not?' Sadly, it is also the equivalent of defending 'Nazism' on the grounds that 'not everything Hitler did was bad.'
In reality, over a period spanning 50 years, tens of millions of individuals around the globe have been churned through a premeditated closed-market swindle (peddled as the 'Amway Business Opportunity') and through related advanced fee frauds (peddled as proven training systems designed to lead to success in the 'Amway Business Opportunity'). It is painfully obvious, given the wider evidence, that these twin frauds are mutually dependent, and that the persons directing them are, thus, engaging in a pattern of ongoing, major, racketeering activity which has enabled them illegally to acquire absolute control over of billions of dollars.
All Steadson's extensive black propaganda activities (mulitiple, professional-looking Websites, available in many languages) although presented as being independent of the 'Amway' bosses, are self-evidently geared towards maintaining an absolute monopoly of information which itself is geared towards preventing core-adherents of the 'Amway' myth ('Total Financial Freedom') from confronting external reality and approaching law enforcement agencies, journalists, legislators, etc., with fully-informed complaints. Thus, Steadson's own efforts are revealed as the criminal obstruction of justice, and as being part of an overall pattern of ongoing, major, rackeering activity.
David Brear


IBOFB said...

Brear, if you have completed such comprehensive research, then why can you supply no evidence to support your claim?

And why have you chosen to exclude the evidence that does not support your claim, instead simply accusing me of nefarious tactics?

quixtarisacult said...

This is too funny. IBOFB denying use of nefarious tactics. Aren't you the 'Swedish Swindler?' Promoter of an intentional monopolistic closed market swindle? Your mask should give you away.

Steal a little and they call you a thief; steal a lot and they call you 'Amway.'

Tex said...


You're a joke, and not the funny kind.

quixtarisacult said...


And you are biggotted racist who just happens to be involved in the most notorious scam business ever invented. Not very smart.

rocket said...

David if you're of no noteable pin level, then how can you claim that Amway is a good business venture?

We won't even address how you defend Amway North America as though it were your true love, in spite of having no experience building it there.

You are really one to speak of things NOT supporting your claims.